Nobody trusts Labour on the economy though.And they were somewhat close. This time the variation is too much.
Nobody trusts Labour on the economy though.And they were somewhat close. This time the variation is too much.
Don't talk BS. Iskander-Ms are $3m. No MRBM is costing less than $1m, even if you used an ant farm to build it.BMs are very cheap. It's basically just a big tube with a rather simple motor, propellent, a warhead, and some rather cheap electronics.
An Iskander costs something like $500k, which is a somewhat advanced missile compared to what Iran uses.
Please don't quote the Guardian on military matters. MRBMs now cost less than HIMARS rockets? Sure....However, the attack was also expensive for Iran, with ballistic missiles generally costing upwards of £80,000. The US estimates Tehran had about 3,000, the largest arsenal in the Middle East.How Iran’s attack on Israel was stopped
Massive drone and missile attack was defeated by Israeli military with orchestrated help of US, UK and Jordanwww.theguardian.com
The electronics still come from abroad. Materials and chemicals are also valued on international markets. If an Iskander-M costs Russia $3m, then sure Iranian costs might be lower due to slave(ish) labour but an MRBM is a lot bigger than an Iskander-M. So $3m is really a baseline bare minimum. Pershing IIs cost $7m in the early '80s, when a can of coke cost 15p. All the Iranian MRBMs used were a lot biggers than Pershings.Iran's BMs are really cheap in terms of dollars due to the collapse of their currency. The effect is worse than it is for Russia. So a small monetary infusion from Russia or China will equate to a lot of rials. So a billion GBP will give them well over 10,000 BMs.
So Iran's expenditure on this attack is miniscule. My guess is way less than $50M.
Nope, it goes to show than Ukraine only has a small token of older-generation western air defence capabilities. If those same attacks were aimed at Israel from Iran, jack shit would get through.It goes to show how much Russia is actually underestimated.
Anyway, 120 BMs is not a lot.
No, it's verified fact. There are video of drones hitting fracking columns, air bases and drone factories 100-1300km inside Russian.All you are doing is explaining how fake Ukraine's propaganda machinery is.
When you decide to build rocket forces, it's going to be a massive investment.
YEah, so Iran has 3,000 total of which what % are MRBMs, because ~1/3rd of the Israel bunch were MRBMs. 120 BMs total, so they don't even have enough for a month of strikes. How well would Iran's air defences do against a similar assault.Here's a list of missiles the Iranians operate.
You react to the intentions, not to the amount of damage caused.
India's descalation post Swift Retreat was taken as a sign of weakness.
As far as we are concerned, we were being responsible. But, as far as the US and China were concerned, we chickened out. It almost directly resulted in Galwan. We just got lucky that our jawans reacted the way they did and saved us some face. But the Chinese accurately predicted our weak political reaction given by the fact that they pretty much went unpunished militarily for taking over the gray zone.
Nobody trusts Labour on the economy though.
Don't talk BS. Iskander-Ms are $3m. No MRBM is costing less than $1m, even if you used an ant farm to build it.
Please don't quote the Guardian on military matters. MRBMs now cost less than HIMARS rockets? Sure....
The electronics still come from abroad. Materials and chemicals are also valued on international markets. If an Iskander-M costs Russia $3m, then sure Iranian costs might be lower due to slave(ish) labour but an MRBM is a lot bigger than an Iskander-M. So $3m is really a baseline bare minimum. Pershing IIs cost $7m in the early '80s, when a can of coke cost 15p. All the Iranian MRBMs used were a lot biggers than Pershings.
If that was the intention, they would have tried again. A second sortie would've been conducted later in the day. But they didn't because the message they wanted to send was that they can retaliate and that was sent.
The Chinese leadership had no control over the escalation in Galwan, they just wanted to continue the salami-slicing that always give results. The escalation was the result of local area commanders going out of control. They had to change the Western theatre commander 4 times in a year since then to reign in the lower rung leadership.
Galwan was a gross miscalculation on the part of the Chinese and they almost lost control of all dominating heights in that sector of the LAC as a result.
They failed the first time, when they supposedly had surprise. How are they going to succeed a second time?
Their attack completely failed. Their targets were air bases, and they were forced to switch to targets that do not need such assets deployed; AWACS, EW aircraft, 30+ jets, none of these were required to hit targets at the border. 2 MKIs could do more than that against the targets they actually ended up attacking. These were secondary targets that were within the range of MLRS.
We were supposed to militarily retaliate to the incursion. The Chinese practically declared war, and we just sat on our as&es, when we had all sorts of military advantages.
Yeah, thankfully they were quite incompetent. But they still managed to prove we are toothless.
No, they didn't. They have successfully pushed us back in many areas. They have cut us off from Depsang via our own road for example.
They failed the first time, when they supposedly had surprise. How are they going to succeed a second time?
The Pak response had escalation management written all over it.
It was after an Indian pilot was captured they were able to manage the escalation not before that. The treatment done to late Flt Lt Ahuja still horrifies the IAF.
Enough people can remember 2008.What the UK's experiencing is an anti-incumbency wave. People are just tired of the stagnation under the Tories.
These Iranian prices come from the same place that the $20k Shahed-136 figure did, before hackers found the actual cost was $290k. Multiply them all by at least 10.For $3M, you can buy 4 Iskanders or 20 Iranian Zolfaghars.
Iran had about 150 ballistic missiles capable of reaching Israel from Iranian territory, and appears to have used up most of that current stockpile in its weekend attack, retired Gen. Frank McKenzie, the former head of U.S. Central Command, said Monday.
Our Jordanian Rafale took part in the drone hunt.
The Chinese will have a far bigger barrage of missiles that they will send towards Taiwan and they will rely on their hypersonics.distance between taiwan & mainland china is 200km.
china has the capability to launch from sea as well. More than that , they wont give a warning of 9 hrs for taiwan to prepare.
Forget abt missiles they will be landing troops if they take out the AD's.
Most of the attacks were confined to northern part of israel bordering jordan and syria with very predicable path.
They wanted to show their capability. The Iranian missile arsenal is just older Chinese and noko missile rip-off's. They can easily be intercepted on top of that NATO af's also assisted. The Iranians wanted to give as much as damage they could but failed because the iron dome, arrow and David sling combo is pretty effective. We don't have anything close to that when facing the Chinese or Pakistanis for that matter.No, the Pakistani attack was serious. They just failed. India was prepared to retaliate with both missiles and even a ground invasion into Pakjab.
It's not clear what Iran's intentions were, they probably thought they would be a bit more successful than what happened, but the attack was well within the capabilities of interception by their IADS.
We lost in Galwan. Apparently we have lost 2000 SQ km after the discussion in 2022. The buffer zone has been considered a Chinese gainYou react to the intentions, not to the amount of damage caused.
India's descalation post Swift Retreat was taken as a sign of weakness.
As far as we are concerned, we were being responsible. But, as far as the US and China were concerned, we chickened out. It almost directly resulted in Galwan. We just got lucky that our jawans reacted the way they did and saved us some face. But the Chinese accurately predicted our weak political reaction given by the fact that they pretty much went unpunished militarily for taking over the gray zone.
Doubt that, chinese consider taiwan as their land including ppl as well. Chinese dont want to be seen as aggressors causing lot of death, they will try to bully taiwan to submission. They will just present a fait accompli.The Chinese will have a far bigger barrage of missiles that they will send towards Taiwan and they will rely on their hypersonics.