LCA Tejas Mk1 & Mk1A - News and discussions

AESA? SDR? All glass cockpit? EW?
Ex F16

1544254069404.png


AESA, All Glass cockpit, SDR ( Rockwell collins ARC-210 RT-2036(C)), BVR -AIM 120D, AIM120C5, WVR- AIM7, AIM9X, Fly By Wire, Unstable design, PGM, AShm, Ground Mapping radar, Terrain hugging capability, CM, Nuclear Delivery, Pretty much everything you mention, all on a proven platform and on offer to IAF with local production by Lockheed Martin.


1544254649503.png


Similar package available on SAAB JAS39 Gripen in single engine flavor;

And then there is always F/A 18 SH, Rafale, EFT, and Mig35OVT in twin engine flavors offering similar packages.
 
Last edited:

****, but supposedly quoting =>
Gagan Shakti 2018: Did LCA-Tejas Mk1 Outshine Jaguar Strike aircraft in its Own Game?

...In 14-day high-intensity combat Air Exercise, LCA performed remarkably well and emerged with best range scores in terms of best weapon delivery by any aircraft fielded in the Gagan Shakti 2018 disclosed Air Marshal Raghunath Nambiar in an article he wrote for ” SALUTE ” which is a Defence magazine covering Indian Armed forces. The superior performance of LCA-Tejas Mk1 in Air-to-Ground Missions over established Strike aircraft like Jaguar fighter-bomber really worked wonders for the indigenous program according to Nambiar...

**** .Read more at India No 1 Defence News Website Gagan Shakti 2018: Did LCA-Tejas Mk1 Outshine Jaguar Strike aircraft in its Own Game? – Indian Defence Research Wing .

Confirms earlier reports from that excercise quoted unnamed IAF officials and LCAs strike performance too.
 
Last edited:
Yes it does

GE 414 has some 25 percent more power than GE 404

Whereas MK 2 has to carry 60 percent more load and more internal fuel than MK 1

Without Two engines , MK 2 will be a failure

The current Mk1 sucks. The Mk1 should have been able to lift at least 5T if the airframe was decent enough. The wings are not as strong, there's still ballast in the aircraft and the landing gear has been over-engineered.

So if you are using the Mk1 as a benchmark to estimate Mk2's payload, then you will go wrong.

Mk1 has an MTOW of 13.5T. Mk2 is being designed for more than 17T.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shekhar Singh
****, but supposedly quoting =>


**** .Read more at India No 1 Defence News Website Gagan Shakti 2018: Did LCA-Tejas Mk1 Outshine Jaguar Strike aircraft in its Own Game? – Indian Defence Research Wing .

Confirms earlier reports from that excercise quoted unnamed IAF officials and LCAs strike performance too.
So we are now comparing LCA with jet of 70s, which is under powered and is hardly considered as fighter jet.

C'mon jaguars is not the right jet to compare with LCA. Compare LCA's accuracy with that of Mirages and Mig29s, they are its real competitors in terms of weapon delivery at least.
 
So we are now comparing LCA with jet of 70s, which is under powered and is hardly considered as fighter jet.

The comparison is actually not wrong, Jag and LCA IOC are single role strike fighters, with similar weapon load capability.
A Darin 3 Jag will even have AESA, HMS, glass cockpit and so on.
 
"New Goal" that just scares the living daylights out of me when it concerns indigenous platforms.

It helped kill the F-16/Gripen requirement and shift the focus to Rafale again through MMRCA 2.0.

I hope that doesn't change to Su30-MKI parameters. :rolleyes:

Even that was on the cards, a twin engine LCA to match Rafale/MKI, but sense prevailed and AMCA is the direct result.

The French had also experimented with the Mirage 4000 a long time ago.
Mirage 4000: origins, characteristics and performance data