LCA Tejas Mk1 & Mk1A - News and discussions

The current Mk1 sucks. The Mk1 should have been able to lift at least 5T if the airframe was decent enough. The wings are not as strong, there's still ballast in the aircraft and the landing gear has been over-engineered.

So if you are using the Mk1 as a benchmark to estimate Mk2's payload, then you will go wrong.

Mk1 has an MTOW of 13.5T. Mk2 is being designed for more than 17T.
Where did you get this 17 ton number
 
Is there any 4th gen plane which has Fly by wire, EW, AESA, BVR, WVR, quartz radome, Software defined radio, all glass cockpit, all together?? If not then why IAF wants all this before FOC of tejas???
Because of MMRCA during which various OEM advertised with their product in their brouchers and presentation, and you forgot many more like bubble canopy, 15 minute turnout, 2.5 hour engine replacement, GAN, open architecture, internal jammer, sensor fusion, STR, Angle of attack, 2.5 hour airborne capability, 1200 km strike radius, Short distance takeoff and landing capability, carrier vaiant, internal IRST, optronics, RWR, MAWs and TVC etc etc and ETC.
 
India selects IAI/Elta Systems radar and EW suite for Tejas LCA Mk 1A
Rahul Bedi, New Delhi - Jane's Defence Weekly

10 December 2018

India's state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) has signed a deal with Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI)/Elta Systems for 83 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radars and an equal number of electronic warfare (EW) suites to be fitted onto the Mk 1A variant of the indigenously developed Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA).

Industry sources told Jane's that the deal for ELM-2052 fire control radars and pod-mounted ELL-8222WB (wide band) self-protection jamming pods was "quietly" signed in late October after IAI/Elta emerged as the lowest bidder for the two compatible systems.

The IAI/Elta products were selected over systems fielded by rivals Thales and Saab, which had also responded to HAL's December 2016 request for quotation for AESA radars and EW suites.

India selects IAI/Elta Systems radar and EW suite for Tejas LCA Mk 1A | Jane's 360
 
India selects IAI/Elta Systems radar and EW suite for Tejas LCA Mk 1A
Rahul Bedi, New Delhi - Jane's Defence Weekly

10 December 2018

India's state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) has signed a deal with Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI)/Elta Systems for 83 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radars and an equal number of electronic warfare (EW) suites to be fitted onto the Mk 1A variant of the indigenously developed Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA).

Industry sources told Jane's that the deal for ELM-2052 fire control radars and pod-mounted ELL-8222WB (wide band) self-protection jamming pods was "quietly" signed in late October after IAI/Elta emerged as the lowest bidder for the two compatible systems.

The IAI/Elta products were selected over systems fielded by rivals Thales and Saab, which had also responded to HAL's December 2016 request for quotation for AESA radars and EW suites.

India selects IAI/Elta Systems radar and EW suite for Tejas LCA Mk 1A | Jane's 360

This will cut out any delays and ToT problems.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Parthu
India selects IAI/Elta Systems radar and EW suite for Tejas LCA Mk 1A
Rahul Bedi, New Delhi - Jane's Defence Weekly

10 December 2018

India's state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) has signed a deal with Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI)/Elta Systems for 83 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radars and an equal number of electronic warfare (EW) suites to be fitted onto the Mk 1A variant of the indigenously developed Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA).

Industry sources told Jane's that the deal for ELM-2052 fire control radars and pod-mounted ELL-8222WB (wide band) self-protection jamming pods was "quietly" signed in late October after IAI/Elta emerged as the lowest bidder for the two compatible systems.

The IAI/Elta products were selected over systems fielded by rivals Thales and Saab, which had also responded to HAL's December 2016 request for quotation for AESA radars and EW suites.

India selects IAI/Elta Systems radar and EW suite for Tejas LCA Mk 1A | Jane's 360

Same radar as on the Jaguar DARIN-3 upgrade. Glad it wasn't a completely different system.

Personally I was counting on either the 2052 or modified RBE-2AA winning the competition (although 2052 was clearly the more realistic option given we already use 2032 MMR on Mk-1). Those were the only 2 systems which would have offered a great capability + having a degree of commonality with other IAF aircraft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sancho
Same radar as on the Jaguar DARIN-3 upgrade. Glad it wasn't a completely different system.

Personally I was counting on either the 2052 or modified RBE-2AA winning the competition (although 2052 was clearly the more realistic option given we already use 2032 MMR on Mk-1). Those were the only 2 systems which would have offered a great capability + having a degree of commonality with other IAF aircraft.

In the end good news for Rafale, as it disminishes single engine OEM built...
 
In the end good news for Rafale, as it disminishes single engine OEM built...

Not for Rafale in India, since an order for LCA, not only had increased commonality in the fleet, but also the possibility to reduce costs, by increasing the RBE 2 production numbers.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: R!cK
Same radar as on the Jaguar DARIN-3 upgrade. Glad it wasn't a completely different system.

Personally I was counting on either the 2052 or modified RBE-2AA winning the competition (although 2052 was clearly the more realistic option given we already use 2032 MMR on Mk-1). Those were the only 2 systems which would have offered a great capability + having a degree of commonality with other IAF aircraft.

Exactly, easy to upgrade from EL 2032, compatible to integrated AAMs, increased commonality in the fleet..., it was the logical choice. The only issue was, that it includes US parts, which makes it dependent on US approvals. We saw that in the already, where they blocked Israel to supply the radar to Saab for the Gripen NG TD.

However, they shouldn't have limited the MK1A to 1 supplier for radar and EW, but maximised the benefits by making 2 separate deals out of it.
 
Let me share something very important here. Meteor is the worst missile for BVR combat with fighters. US, Russia and Israel have the tech to develop one but have refused to do so. Why?
The initial burnout of the motor gives out over 1200*F temp which can be detected from over 50NM by modern day MAWS. USAF has chosen a tactic to fire AMRAAM-D from over 165KMs and break off by 135KMs. Why? To ensure that initial burnout is beyond the detection range of MAWS and after that the missile cruises loosing its kinetic energy slowly. During that phase it will not be detected by the MAWS.
Using a dual pulse motor to extend range wherein the missile goes thru initial boost where it can be detected at launch and then using duel pulse to complete the end game is better than having a missile which has its backside on fire thruout and will be detected by MAWS from very large distances giving enough warning to the target to either vacate or accelerate away from the NFU of the approaching missile.
Meteor is good for only HVTs which are slow but useless for fighters. I will put MICA NG as the best BVR missile with dual pulse motor.
 
Last edited:
Let me share something very important here. Meteor is the worst missile for BVR combat with fighters. US, Russia and Israel have the tech to develop one but have refused to do so.

Russia is developing a ramjet version of R77, Israel is using rocket boosters for Derby or Python V, Japan is developing a ramjet AAM with tech support from the Europeans, China and even DRDO have similar developments too.Why? Because they understand, that speed is the crucial advantage to increase kill probability, not extending maximum range.

And the fact that France itself puts it's hope on Meteor, while MICA NG is just a modernisation to arm Mirage 2000s in future, should tell you something too.
 
He is one person who I tangled with back in 2007-08 over Arjun. Best read if you have to appreciate a comparative better understanding of an issue than others and are looking to boost your ego (since his disjoint logic is worth a laugh or two at times). He may be able to put data on table, but unfortunately, like Intelligence Operations, you may have the data but you can do squat if you do not know what to do with it.

Anyways, am booked for 23 Feb 19 for Aero India, 24th being Sunday and last day, the crowds will drown us.

@vstol Jockey sir, I hope we can look forward to your presence at the show?

@suryakiran booked tickets?

how do I know you in real life when I come down to Aero India?
 
Let me share something very important here. Meteor is the worst missile for BVR combat with fighters. US, Russia and Israel have the tech to develop one but have refused to do so. Why?
The initial burnout of the motor gives out over 1200*F temp which can be detected from over 50NM by modern day MAWS. USAF has chosen a tactic to fire AMRAAM-D from over 165KMs and break off by 135KMs. Why? To ensure that initial burnout is beyond the detection range of MAWS and after that the missile cruises loosing its kinetic energy slowly. During that phase it will not be detected by the MAWS.
Using a dual pulse motor to extend range wherein the missile goes thru initial boost where it can be detected at launch and then using duel pulse to complete the end game is better than having a missile which has its backside on fire thruout and will be detected by MAWS from very large distances giving enough warning to the target to either vacate or accelerate away from the NFU of the approaching missile.
Meteor is good for only HVTs which are slow but useless for fighters. I will put MICA NG as the best BVR missile with dual pulse motor.

Both types of missiles can complement each other though.

Also, from what I've heard, the Meteor will sustain its speed no different from any regular missile during cruise phase, but accelerate during endgame just like a dual pulse motor would. The only difference is the Meteor's endgame can be much larger than a missile with solid rocket motors, thereby increasing the NEZ.

Basically, the initial burn time for both Meteor and solid rocket is more or less the same. The cruise profile is similar. And the Meteor's endgame is superior, which is where we see the real difference.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Hellfire