Maneuverability -LCA has better TW ratio which gives it better lift,as well as better wing loading.Its delta design makes it far more maneuverable.
As far as I know, the LCA's
g tolerances and AoA limits are still lower than MiG-21's.
With FBW and a HMD combined with off-boresight missiles, a bit of maneuverability can be traded in, but then again, MiG-21 Bison has HMD+R73E as well.
Either way, I wouldn't consider it wise for the LCA to engage in dogfights, not while it still lacks a cannon as backup. Once the missiles are spent, the Mk-1 is all but defenceless. Mk-1A will be the same - unless an external gun pod is developed (and that will come with its own drawbacks - increased drag, 1 less hardpoint etc.)
When war comes calling, it will fight. But as a choice platform for air combat? I'd think a lot of pilots who love their gun will find it hard to put faith in the LCA.
A ELTA jammer is planned for MK1A and MWR/MAWS is planned for Tejas MK2.
I would think that as far as the external Elta jammer is concerned (EL/L-8222), you can tack that on to Mk-1 as well. Same will be the case for Mk-1A, external only. There's no new space created internally to accommodate an Internal SPJ.
As of MAWS, I believe there are to be included in the EW suite for Mk-1A. However, they will have to be tacked on to pylons or elsewhere. Because again, no internal space.
Like this -
Mk-2 however is meant to have internally-mounted MAWS apertures.
Nope.
How then it will detect or probably know that a missile is on air targeted against it?
If it could know without MAWS that a missile has been launched toward it, what then would be the purpose of MAWS?
Short answer: It won't know.