Line of Actual Control (LAC) : India & Tibet Border Updates

Oh my gawd, i thought China is your higher than mountain , deeper than Ocean , all weather friend. I thought 'Shipek' will make Pakistan the next Asian Tiger and Gwadar will shit over Dubai
What you don't understand is to do business with Someone you don't necessarily need to like them and it's the same both ways. They don't need to like us either.
FYI India Pakistan annual business is 4 billion USD.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hellfire
No organization can succeed where only the top boss is visionary and his execution team is either inept or timid or purely undermining the efforts. We have this happening a lot of times.
The visionary should have the vision to choose the right ppl for the team & propagate right values if not s/he is no different from the team members. Question we need to ask what prevents the leader to choose the right ppl , are they just faking it ? Just like we had Mr clean MMS who was a facade for all the corrupt elements.
 
The visionary should have the vision to choose the right ppl for the team & propagate right values if not s/he is no different from the team members. Question we need to ask what prevents the leader to choose the right ppl , are they just faking it ? Just like we had Mr clean MMS who was a facade for all the corrupt elements.


You cant spend 10 years in a 5 years term putting correct people in place.

Just like a CO makes do with whatever calibre of officers he has, so does the PM.
 

I'd recommend interested members visit PKS's blog for his latest article whose link I've put up before & read it to get an insight into the current stand off but more importantly go to the comments section where he's patiently built up a case for our pussilanimity, diagnosed the malaise - our malaise in deciphering Chinese motives, being perpetually flat footed & being led up the garden path mostly coz of our own penchant for wish fulfillment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jetray and Paro
Incorrect.

Indian Army spoke of Two Front War in 1970, when Smt Indira Gandhi, the then PM, told IA to prepare for war. Please get your facts right. It was her resolve in 70s and her foresight in 80s, which saw India put forth what is unofficially called the Indira Doctrine.

It was also under her stewardship that Indian Army Team on Introduction of Technology was formed in 1982 and plan was made to increase Indian footprint from Malacca in East to Aden in West. Unfortunately, she died, her son remained clueless and when Gen Sunderji undertook Ex Brasstacks and Ex Chequerboard, the first major attempt at showcasing capability to fight on two fronts, our bureaucrats and politicians got scared as they felt that Army was becoming too strong. Of course, fall of USSR and our own weak economy ultimately did us in.

Everything we have today is because of her. And hopefully everything we will have in the future is because of what Modi does today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hellfire and vikata
With China and India must have asked for a Statement by Trump

No chance. Trump just has foot-in-mouth disease. He tweeted on his own.

He has requested to become a mediator in every potential conflict zone around the world. It has nothing to do with anger or any such sort of juvenile emotion.

As is and as it will always be, India does not want third party mediation from any world power. It's in our interests to handle everything bilaterally, whatever problem we have with anybody.
 
And have weak central authorities which will need either own troops to stay in place to stabilize or we withdraw to watch them collapse as Afghanistan did and then have more headache in terms of increased instability which will spread over into Kashmir. That will entail higher costs. The nation has to first understand the costs.

There's no actual rule saying we have to leave. Pakistan is still a part of historical India. All we have to do is run it like an autonomous region with restriction on population movement.

There is not going to be a two front war.

But in a very rare hypothetical scenario where we do have to fight on two fronts simultanneously, we gain west, we loose in North and East a bit ... and try to regain as our capacities match up to the effort required (with US, UK, France and others indirectly supporting and maybe directly intervening). Hard fact.

If we throw endless amounts of money at it, is it possible to make the 3 Strike Corps facing Pakistan flexible enough to be used on the offensive against China as well? Not in the plains on defence of course, I mean as a Strike Corps on offence in the moutains and their side of the flat lands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hellfire
If pakistan has balls or mard-e-momin they need fight India directly instead of resorting to terrorism on civilians or dragging in sugar daddy china.

Disrespectful? how about being shameless after committing atrocities like rape,murder...genocide on fellow muslims. Its cheap comes at just Rs 1.25....


View attachment 16107
90 thousand again. Everytime I say anything on an annoying post,you guys post pictures and say 90 thousand. We don't treat indians badly on pakistani defence forums. We don't humiliate them. I can understand your mentality. It's okay. It's useless to even comment on India China standoff because you guys only want to show us 90 thousand pictures,pants removal ceremony and other things like that. Even a senior member like nilgiri is posting 90 thousand. I think it's time to leave India on its own. You guys don't want comments from other countries specially from Pakistan.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Schwifty
India cannot fight Pakistan conventionally & India can't EVEN imagine in wildest dreams to take on China A) conventially b) economically C) nuclear
so you made your account 9 days back, made 3 posts to say this?

India cannot fight pakistan convntionally? why not? if you think the difference between India and China is too vast, the difference between India and Pakistan is even greater.
 
India cannot fight Pakistan conventionally & India can't EVEN imagine in wildest dreams to take on China A) conventially b) economically C) nuclear
images.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Hydra and Sulla84
We don't treat indians badly on pakistani defence forums.
Oh?
Oh?
Oh?
Ever seen a certain mod banning Indian user because India revoked 370? I am sure he is still salty to this day.
India cannot fight Pakistan conventionally & India can't EVEN imagine in wildest dreams to take on China A) conventially b) economically C) nuclear
India has fought pakistan conventionally in 47, 65, 71, 99.
In each case either there was no significant result or massive loss of Pakistan's territory.
 
I saw the most detailed satellite images of Phuck-sum-chink Lso Lake on Planet Lab today taken on 27th may. Why don't some peeps here get an account there to get those pictures? We can then all play the game of "Name that chink" from outer space. I so want to count the tents. Someone in college?

Better than relying on news sites with "according to senior bureaucrat who shall remain nameless" stories.