It perfectly describes India's foreign policy, no idea where they want to be.
It seems Chinese are in dilemma .
There first strategy was to push back us and expected the Covid issue will cause cold response from India ln side.
Turned out that i it was a back firing one .
Now under any circumstances they dont want a full scale war.
So initiated another strategy .
To boggeddown us in the border for long time to drain our resources .
As a retaliation because of our economic sanctions against them.Chinese economy can withstand that.
What about us ?@vstol Jockey @nair @Ashwin
IMHO, it was a revenge for Doklam with an aim to humiliate Modi and make India look like a sissy which can be tamed easily by the Chinese. They did this to probably change the narrative post Doklam and show the other countries of SCS that they are the real boss as even India can't do anything to them. They nearly pulled it off but for Galwan followed by IA going into offensive by taking over those peaks. Now if you read the ground situation. We have PLA encircled in a horse shoe shape formation south of PT and we can completely encircle them and wipe out each and every PLA soldier by going forward from Rechin La and cutting off the road to Rutog.It seems Chinese are in dilemma .
There first strategy was to push back us and expected the Covid issue will cause cold response from India ln side.
Turned out that i it was a back firing one .
Now under any circumstances they dont want a full scale war.
So initiated another strategy .
To boggeddown us in the border for long time to drain our resources .
As a retaliation because of our economic sanctions against them.Chinese economy can withstand that.
What about us ?@vstol Jockey @nair @Ashwin
theoretically, this may be correct. but looking at how geopolitics is shaping up and GOI moves, nothing will happen on ground. No military skirmish will take place, let alone all out war.IMHO, it was a revenge for Doklam with an aim to humiliate Modi and make India look like a sissy which can be tamed easily by the Chinese. They did this to probably change the narrative post Doklam and show the other countries of SCS that they are the real boss as even India can't do anything to them. They nearly pulled it off but for Galwan followed by IA going into offensive by taking over those peaks. Now if you read the ground situation. We have PLA encircled in a horse shoe shape formation south of PT and we can completely encircle them and wipe out each and every PLA soldier by going forward from Rechin La and cutting off the road to Rutog.
In the North PT, we are dominating the ridgeline upto Sijap/Khurnak Fort and have effectively cut off their North PT garrison from Kongka La and South PT garrison. Even That Garrison is now at the mercy of IA with no chance of any resupply in case of hostilities and under attack from North and South PT shores. Chinese have effectively boxed themselves into a much worse situation than Doklam and they have no other option but to have even a bigger set back and loss of face. Irrespective of what they choose, they will loose. AND loose very badly.
While I agree to your post regarding Mehbooba Mufti, I wish to clarify that After 29th Aug, we are controlling the narrative on LAC. You must see how the chinese have toned down since then. Before 29th, they had refused to even consider moving back beyond F5 while they wanted India to go back to F2 for that. Now they are game to go back to F8 provided India goes back to F3. India has refused this also. So who is controlling the narrative now?theoretically, this may be correct. but looking at how geopolitics is shaping up and GOI moves, nothing will happen on ground. No military skirmish will take place, let alone all out war.
Release of Mehbooba Mufti indicates GOI wants to once gain (foolishly?) explore the conciliation narrative in J&K, and are once again playing into the hands of Pak, while the Chicoms are busy setting up airbases in Skardu. In case hostilities do break out, it will most certainly be a two front affair, and we are in for some tough times, especially if we continue to remain reactive and let the opponents set the narrative.
especially if we continue to remain reactive and let the opponents set the narrative.
During Balakot and post Balakot the govt allowed a lot of leeway to give Pak a face saving exit. But they didn't take it. So the next time's gonna be a different story. Now Pakistan is on the defensive in pretty much every area. They have practically handed over the airspace over LoC to the IAF and now we are happily killing them where they stand using artillery.
With the LAC problem, GoI gave the Chinese a way to end it, with a restoration to status quo ante. The Chinese didn't accept. Then the army made its move, and the Chinese switched from not even talking to us to practically begging us to restore status quo ante. Now we are not ready for status quo ante.
So I do not know what this narrative you speak of really is.
I hope we kill off both the abdullah's and mufti's, sometimes I wish we were more like the Chinese. Both them are gangsters who terrorise the average Kashmiri..theoretically, this may be correct. but looking at how geopolitics is shaping up and GOI moves, nothing will happen on ground. No military skirmish will take place, let alone all out war.
Release of Mehbooba Mufti indicates GOI wants to once gain (foolishly?) explore the conciliation narrative in J&K, and are once again playing into the hands of Pak, while the Chicoms are busy setting up airbases in Skardu. In case hostilities do break out, it will most certainly be a two front affair, and we are in for some tough times, especially if we continue to remain reactive and let the opponents set the narrative.
India demolishes China’s new excuse for Ladakh stand-off in 3 points
India China border: The PLA’s concerns around the Indian infrastructure upgrade in Ladakh stem from the fear that it could pose a military threat to the multi-billion China Pakistan Economic Corridorm.hindustantimes.com
We have Not yet given Sufficient Punishment to Pakistan
At least A Few Hammers must be dropped soon on Useful Targets like
Brigade HQ and SAM sites
The next one's gotta be big, and by big I mean gigantic. For example, take back PoK at the higher end or even a limited war, which includes taking out a sufficiently large part of their air force, like some force multipliers and a squadron or two worth of jets. Simple punishment won't be enough.
I have a question regarding taking back PoK.
If we recapture PoK and GB, what stops Paxtan to pressurize us through UN and other countries to carry out plebiscite?
The first condition is met and ball will be in our court. We will be perpetually defending our position where we haven't invested enough in counter narrative. Western rags are already infiltrated by jihadis and our jaichands will gladly vilify GoI internationally.
Better only to take back GB and wait till paxtan disintegrates.
I have a question regarding taking back PoK.
If we recapture PoK and GB, what stops Paxtan to pressurize us through UN and other countries to carry out plebiscite?
The first condition is met and ball will be in our court. We will be perpetually defending our position where we haven't invested enough in counter narrative. Western rags are already infiltrated by jihadis and our jaichands will gladly vilify GoI internationally.
Better only to take back GB and wait till paxtan disintegrates.
IMHO, it was a revenge for Doklam with an aim to humiliate Modi and make India look like a sissy which can be tamed easily by the Chinese. They did this to probably change the narrative post Doklam and show the other countries of SCS that they are the real boss as even India can't do anything to them. They nearly pulled it off but for Galwan followed by IA going into offensive by taking over those peaks. Now if you read the ground situation. We have PLA encircled in a horse shoe shape formation south of PT and we can completely encircle them and wipe out each and every PLA soldier by going forward from Rechin La and cutting off the road to Rutog. In the North PT, we are dominating the ridgeline upto Sijap/Khurnak Fort and have effectively cut off their North PT garrison from Kongka La and South PT garrison. Even That Garrison is now at the mercy of IA with no chance of any resupply in case of hostilities and under attack from North and South PT shores. Chinese have effectively boxed themselves into a much worse situation than Doklam and they have no other option but to have even a bigger set back and loss of face. Irrespective of what they choose, they will loose. AND loose very badly.
IMHO, it was a revenge for Doklam with an aim to humiliate Modi and make India look like a sissy which can be tamed easily by the Chinese. They did this to probably change the narrative post Doklam and show the other countries of SCS that they are the real boss as even India can't do anything to them. They nearly pulled it off but for Galwan followed by IA going into offensive by taking over those peaks. Now if you read the ground situation. We have PLA encircled in a horse shoe shape formation south of PT and we can completely encircle them and wipe out each and every PLA soldier by going forward from Rechin La and cutting off the road to Rutog. In the North PT, we are dominating the ridgeline upto Sijap/Khurnak Fort and have effectively cut off their North PT garrison from Kongka La and South PT garrison. Even That Garrison is now at the mercy of IA with no chance of any resupply in case of hostilities and under attack from North and South PT shores. Chinese have effectively boxed themselves into a much worse situation than Doklam and they have no other option but to have even a bigger set back and loss of face. Irrespective of what they choose, they will loose. AND loose very badly.
India demolishes China’s new excuse for Ladakh stand-off in 3 points
India China border: The PLA’s concerns around the Indian infrastructure upgrade in Ladakh stem from the fear that it could pose a military threat to the multi-billion China Pakistan Economic Corridorm.hindustantimes.com
We have Not yet given Sufficient Punishment to Pakistan
At least A Few Hammers must be dropped soon on Useful Targets like
Brigade HQ and SAM sites
I have a question regarding taking back PoK.
If we recapture PoK and GB, what stops Paxtan to pressurize us through UN and other countries to carry out plebiscite?
The first condition is met and ball will be in our court. We will be perpetually defending our position where we haven't invested enough in counter narrative. Western rags are already infiltrated by jihadis and our jaichands will gladly vilify GoI internationally.
Better only to take back GB and wait till paxtan disintegrates.
The next one's gotta be big, and by big I mean gigantic. For example, take back PoK at the higher end or even a limited war, which includes taking out a sufficiently large part of their air force, like some force multipliers and a squadron or two worth of jets. Simple punishment won't be enough.
No cost is higher for the pride of a nation. We have advantage over PLA in terms of strategic gains and also the additional area that we control now. I will not like to agree to status quo ante now as we have played our cards and pulling back will mean that PLA will occupy those areas which we vacate. It is now going to be a situation like Siachin. I know for sure that sooner or later, PLA will withdraw from the area or reduce its troop numbers allowing us to reduce our numbers.What about the pressure that this on give us on our coffers?
No cost is higher for the pride of a nation. We have advantage over PLA in terms of strategic gains and also the additional area that we control now. I will not like to agree to status quo ante now as we have played our cards and pulling back will mean that PLA will occupy those areas which we vacate. It is now going to be a situation like Siachin. I know for sure that sooner or later, PLA will withdraw from the area or reduce its troop numbers allowing us to reduce our numbers.
Otherwise, we will have a limited skirmish which will be very short and intense.