
India’s apex traders association announces campaign to boycott Chinese products
CAIT wants to bring down the imports from China to $13 billion by December 2021
More than military war, china fears a entrapment like russia is stuck in. chinese will obviously will respond with a strong response if highway is attacked. china sees India has threat to its geographical aggrandizement and will never depend on us. They will mostly have a deal with myanmar at the best. If they were interested in peace with India they would never support pakistan.In the larger scheme of things, Karakoram highway is actually a backup. It passes through disputed area, it is closed for a third of year, it is very vulnerable. A small military party with some explosives can easily take it out of commission for many years. It certainly is not A-game of China as far as connectivity goes. If they had better relations with India, they could have the safest approach bypassing all the other chokepoints. A road via Arunanchal Pradesh connecting to both Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea would have been infinitely better than all this up in the cloud approach via Karakoram highway.
Because you fought in 1962, howsoever badly, you got the Line of Actual Control. Because you gave them a bloody nose in 1967, Mao signalled a detente of sorts. Because you moved in 1987, they changed their strategy. Fight now & they will come to the table in earnestness.
— Saurav Jha (@SJha1618) June 9, 2020
If GDP & 'relative power' were everything then the Taliban would not even have dreamt of fighting America. Fighting is really about will & strategy. Not academic constructs.
— Saurav Jha (@SJha1618) June 9, 2020
There was an intense debate in Hanoi prior to the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War about whether or not to fight China. Ultimately, they decided to fight, even if they were going to lose. The outcome of course was favourable to them & the rest is history.
— Saurav Jha (@SJha1618) June 9, 2020
Trouble for them is that Mayanmar's geography does not make a good site for a port.They will mostly have a deal with myanmar at the best.
Its time to speak through gun barrel, or else they may come and start construction of bunkers in new delhiBecause you fought in 1962, howsoever badly, you got the Line of Actual Control. Because you gave them a bloody nose in 1967, Mao signalled a detente of sorts. Because you moved in 1987, they changed their strategy. Fight now & they will come to the table in earnestness.
— Saurav Jha (@SJha1618) June 9, 2020
If GDP & 'relative power' were everything then the Taliban would not even have dreamt of fighting America. Fighting is really about will & strategy. Not academic constructs.
— Saurav Jha (@SJha1618) June 9, 2020
There was an intense debate in Hanoi prior to the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War about whether or not to fight China. Ultimately, they decided to fight, even if they were going to lose. The outcome of course was favourable to them & the rest is history.
— Saurav Jha (@SJha1618) June 9, 2020
![]()
India’s apex traders association announces campaign to boycott Chinese products
CAIT wants to bring down the imports from China to $13 billion by December 2021www.livemint.com
If we start the war now, then we would be playing directly in the hands of US.Because you fought in 1962, howsoever badly, you got the Line of Actual Control. Because you gave them a bloody nose in 1967, Mao signalled a detente of sorts. Because you moved in 1987, they changed their strategy. Fight now & they will come to the table in earnestness.
— Saurav Jha (@SJha1618) June 9, 2020
If GDP & 'relative power' were everything then the Taliban would not even have dreamt of fighting America. Fighting is really about will & strategy. Not academic constructs.
— Saurav Jha (@SJha1618) June 9, 2020
There was an intense debate in Hanoi prior to the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War about whether or not to fight China. Ultimately, they decided to fight, even if they were going to lose. The outcome of course was favourable to them & the rest is history.
— Saurav Jha (@SJha1618) June 9, 2020
Glad that AB Vajpayee doesn't have this attitude in 1999, glad that Indira, sashtriji doesnt have this so called strategy to make US involved in the conflict first.If we start the war now, then we would be playing directly in the hands of US.
We MUST wait for US to get involved first only then we make our move. Time is not on Chinese side we could easily wait. And if all of this doesn't turn into a shooting war then too we would be the biggest winner.
Good. Your worth increased by half-a-shade. Now, get paratroopers jumping off at night. Also post videos of them landing. This is your task for tomorrow. Go & start working on it now. https://t.co/K7J7FK3Etk
— Sniper (@avarakai) June 9, 2020
Two mistakes.Glad that AB Vajpayee doesn't have this attitude in 1999, glad that Indira, sashtriji doesnt have this so called strategy to make US involved in the conflict first.
To the contrary, we have crossed red line too many times. Abrogating 370 is one. Increasing deployment is another. Continuing border road construction is yet another. Remember, they are used to India that will withdraw.
Don't be surprised if you see a Taiwan India join statement or India allowing some kind of representation from Taiwan just short of actually declaring them to be an independent country.
BTW, I so want to see that stupid Police Park in Delhi to be converted to Taiwanese embassy.
Sources have told India Today TV that a number of meetings are planned between the military leaders of India and China and the team is ready in Chushul for the talks.
— IndiaToday (@IndiaToday) June 9, 2020
(@manjeetnegilive)#India #China https://t.co/ZR0ieewuEZ
Members of the Indian military team are in Chushul preparing for talks with #China which are likely to be held in the next few days. #IndiaChinaBorderTension#IndiaChinaBorder https://t.co/m6MeHfUK0A
— Business Standard (@bsindia) June 9, 2020
Legal? What legal? Do laws matter in international arena? Are there even "laws" or just "treaties"? Will it be first time that China gave a shit about "laws"? A certain UNCLOWS and ICJ decision comes to mind...China has zero legal standing on Kashmir.
Thats what we think. Not necessarily China. Evidence is their reaction.Article 370 is an internal matter.
Had that been the case, the situation would not have been what we have currently. Again, thats what India thinks. China's action tells us that they don't agree with us.Deploying forces is the prerogative of the GoI. Construction of roads within Indian territory is the prerogative of India.
If there were no red lines, situation would have never been as tense.There is no crossing red line here. It is about drawing the red line.
Negotiations are on...More Talks to happen
Not exactly. Difference is very artificial.Understand the difference before commenting.
India and China disengage at multiple points in Eastern Ladakh. Troops and infantry combat vehicles moved back by 2.5 km by People’s Liberation Army in Galwan area, Patrolling Point 15 and Hot Springs area. India has also moved some of its troops back: Top Govt Sources to ANI pic.twitter.com/2wIrBm67HD
— ANI (@ANI) June 9, 2020
Legal? What legal? Do laws matter in international arena? Are there even "laws" or just "treaties"? Will it be first time that China gave a shit about "laws"? A certain UNCLOWS and ICJ decision comes to mind...
BTW, "Kashmir" before was entire state of J&K including Ladakh and that includes Aksai Chin, Demchok too.
Thats what we think. Not necessarily China. Evidence is their reaction.
Had that been the case, the situation would not have been what we have currently. Again, thats what India thinks. China's action tells us that they don't agree with us.
If there were no red lines, situation would have never been as tense.
Negotiations are on...
Not exactly. Difference is very artificial.
India and China disengage at multiple points in Eastern Ladakh. Troops and infantry combat vehicles moved back by 2.5 km by People’s Liberation Army in Galwan area, Patrolling Point 15 and Hot Springs area. India has also moved some of its troops back: Top Govt Sources to ANI pic.twitter.com/2wIrBm67HD
— ANI (@ANI) June 9, 2020
LAC Standoff: India and China disengage at multiple points in Eastern Ladakh https://t.co/AE92ZUoHPB
— Republic (@republic) June 9, 2020
Chinese came to realise the US game plan at last.REPUBLIC. TV also showing that PLA has withdrawn
India and China disengage at multiple points in Eastern Ladakh. Troops and infantry combat vehicles moved back by 2.5 km by People’s Liberation Army in Galwan area, Patrolling Point 15 and Hot Springs area. India has also moved some of its troops back: Top Govt Sources to ANI pic.twitter.com/2wIrBm67HD
— ANI (@ANI) June 9, 2020
REPUBLIC. TV also showing that PLA has withdrawn
Honestly speaking, I am not very confident about what we should do. I am only analyzing what is happening. Rest of the stuff is you putting words in my mouth.very clearly shows what you believe we should do.