LOC Flare up: Related news and Discussions
- Thread starter Parul
- Start date
do u mind islamabad or rawalpindiWill 15 Aug address to the nation be made from Gwadar or Skardu?
Maybe Arsalan can help in conveying the message and back channel to get the bodies back.
I had already told @Arsalan123 to clear the KACHRA as we don't want to dirty our hands burying the Pak army shits like we did during Kargil war...Maybe Arsalan can help in conveying the message and back channel to get the bodies back.
Already ??? Pakistan doesn't take their dead so early, give it a few years. Remember Kargil ?
Aim is to achieve incremental gains in PoJ&K. The present government abandoned plans of an honourable peace on basis of Simla Agreement wherein LC was to be taken as a de-facto border. After PM Modi's attempts at peace with then Pakistani PM Sharif were scuttled by Pakistani Security establishment, this view has been dumped. The result of this can be seen from the '16 Surgical Strikes ownership by Government of India and subsequent strikes into Balakote.
End game is to increase costs for Pakistan, do a reverse of 1000 cuts on it instead and to make incremental gains when situation arises and hold them.
In the interim, I do expect a trifurcation of the State, which will effectively put an end to the cycle of anarchy in the State, thereby forcing Pakistan to incorporate so called Azad J&K into its fold or altering status of Gilgit-Baltistan in order to bolster it's position (in its views) in negotiations. That, of course, shall be a tipping point, if it were to happen.
Fifth one is falcon
Nah ..... ain't I.
While the nation is looking at the short term objectives, I am looking at the objectives that are more core to Indian requirements (securing access to the Central Asian Republics as an alternative from Iran, which remains a risk in terms of stability and security of own investments and interests) as also addressing the political beliefs of the powers that be in India today.
Two core policies of Governments of India are bearing fruit now. Irrespective of what one may say of UPA, one of those policies were initiated by them.
And @Hellfire then had opposed it vehemently by scaring off with the nuclear destruction consequence.
Because at the time, the context was military action. Right now, it is more to do with a multiple axes approach with minimal military component (in terms of direct/indirect military involvement)
I still say - a military confrontation at that time would have been a problem. In 2015, as I have said earlier, we had mobilized to take on Pakistan, but US under Obama was not firmly behind India. Presently, the ball game is quite different. Pres. Trump really does not care for Pakistan either ways. The present pressure from India is allowing US to wrangle 'concessions' from Pakistan over Afghanistan ..... India remains the pointman in dealing with Pakistan
For us Internal Restructuring is Far more important to end the Cycle of violence
But Pakistan will definitely intervene
And hence these low level Pre emptive Strikes on POK
But Pakistan will definitely intervene
And hence these low level Pre emptive Strikes on POK
If Pakistan intervenes ,internal cockroaches will go silent ,they wont be able to attack the government
We take back our fallen and hand over to their family......Sourav Kalia....Sqdr Ahuja are few to name......That's the difference between Indian army and Pakistani Army