From MiG -19 was never part of the PLAAF which is why the Chinese skipped out the 1st Gen, we've graduated within less than the space of a day to the Chinese operated the MiG-19 under a different moniker ( left unsaid is because the nomenclature was different, resident story teller who's also a closet Mandarin speaker, among many other things that I'd get to later - all post 8 pm , couldn't recognize the FA, hence the previous error which's since been rectified. "So it's all good. ") but since it was NOT DEVELOPED by them MERELY OPERATED by them, they did not account for it while defining Generations for FA.
Source - (its still the same , like it has been forever, silly ) - trust me, bro.
I actually wanted to inform everybody ,who're actually taking the trouble of reading this deconstruction of RST fwiw , but not RESIDENT STORYTELLER himself, that both the J-5 & J-6 WEREN'T DEVELOPED by China BUT LICENSE PRODUCED FROM SKD & CKD ( which'd blow his argument up at the very onset of my rebuttal , but I won't) like we did later with HAL, which is why they're listed as 1st Gen & J-7 as 2nd Gen, because the MiG-15 was first inducted in 1949 -50 , hence conforming to the broad gist for the intrinsic link between T/L & Generations for the purpose of classification of FA as per the Chinese system , according to the link I've provided in the article in # 4468
During 1950, the
Kremlin agreed to supply China and North Korea with MiG-15s, as well as train their pilots.
but that'd mean more heart burn for RST, more tearing of hair , more convoluted reasoning, more & more pages being needlessly filled in resulting in more bytes of data & bigger bills for storage thus incurred on servers for the administration & management here. So I won't point it out .
Instead I'd point out to a logical fallacy which is immediately & clearly visible & the greatest weakness in RST's line of argument.
Instead of arguing development, RST should've argued mfg - with or without ToT, since the MiG-15 though inducted very early in 1950 (was not mfgd in China)at least as per official records though it's quite possible PLAAF & DPRK pilots were trained well in advance as Kim Il Sung broached the subject of invasion of what's now RoK in 1949 itself with Stalin for which he asked Kim to co ordinate with Mao as SU couldn't afford to be directly involved as they were still recovering from WW-2 & didn't have any Marshall Plan to bail them out plus NATO had come into existence.
{ Stalin feared getting flanked on either side & wasn't confident of marshalling enough resources to fight on both or either front. OTOH he promised both Kim & Mao full support including arms, ammo, training, etc for he was confident Mao wouldn't & couldn't live with the Americans in both post WW-2 Japan & RoK flanking him & stoking his paranoia.
In the event Stalin was right about Mao & his line of thought. It's another matter that Mao & his successors just like Kim & his descendants had to live with the Americans in the Korean peninsula & Japan till date. }
But I digress. Coming back to the topic, had he chosen this line of argument namely MANUFACTURING instead of DEVELOPMENT , he can still get out of jail. I'm willing display large heartedness if RST were to claim a typo & let the matter rest. It's another matter that I'm in strong agreement with the phrase - Naql mein bhi Aql chahiye. But I'm willing to overlook that as well putting it down to post 8 pm hangover.
Just that one change brings his argument in harmony with the definition of generations of FA in the Chinese system of things as then their 1st Gen is J-5 & J-6 thru ToT & deployment in the 1950's & 60's , J-7 in the 1970's & on & on with some overlap in T/Ls as pointed out below.
Curiously & just to puncture RST's argument more, the J-7 themselves were license built & NOT DEVELOPED AS FAR AS THE FIRST PRODUCTION MODELS WENT ( which happened later that decade onwards) but & here's the catch - while China received most of the drawings & ToT in 1964 , THEY DIDN'T RECEIVE IT ALL, as the famous Sino Soviet split occured in 1962 & the Chinese had to make do with what they had.
BackgroundEdit
In the 1950s and early 1960s, the
Soviet Union shared a large proportion of its conventional weapons technology with its neighbor, the
People's Republic of China. One such example is the
MiG-19, which was locally produced by China as the
Shenyang J-6 from as early as 1958.
[6] During the same decade, the even more capable
MiG-21 had been developed by the Soviets; this fighter, being inexpensive but fast, suited the strategy of forming large groups of 'people's fighters' to overcome the technological advantages of Western aircraft. However, the
Sino-Soviet split abruptly ended initial cooperation efforts; between 28 July 28 and 1 September 1960, the Soviet Union withdrew its advisers from China, resulting in the J-7 project coming to a halt in China.
During February 1962, Soviet Premier
Nikita Khrushchev unexpectedly wrote to
Mao Zedong to inform him that the Soviet Union was willing to transfer MiG-21 technology to China, and he asked the Chinese to promptly send their representatives to the Soviet Union to discuss arrangements. The Chinese viewed this offer as a Soviet gesture to make peace, while suspicious, they were nonetheless eager to take up the Soviet offer of an aircraft deal. A delegation headed by General
Liu Yalou, the commander-in-chief of the
People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) and himself a Soviet military academy graduate, was dispatched to
Moscow immediately; the Chinese delegation was given three days to visit the MiG-21's production facility, which was previously off-limits to foreigners.
[7] The visit's authorization was personally given by Nikita Khrushchev, and on 30 March 1962, the technology transfer deal was signed.[
citation needed]
[8]
en.wikipedia.org
Although the Chinese mfgd the initial lot of J-7 in 1967 , based on the kits they received & thanks to reverse engineering , due to a whole host of reasons & thanks to not receiving comprehensive drawings, the Chinese had to develop some sub systems in house which took a lot of time as they lacked industrial expertise & depth. Long story short they achieved Soviet Union standards for performance of the MiG-21 only in the mid 80's thru a lot of trial & error.
Just to recapitulate my argument here's the list of Generations of FA as defined by the Chinese with the article linked.
�
Aircraft Generations | | |
---|
1st | Circa 1945-1955 aircraft, such as:
F-86. | Aircraft deployed in 1950s-1960s, such as:
J-5 & J-6. |
2nd | Circa 1955-1960 aircraft, such as:
F-104 & F-105. | Aircraft deployed in 1970s-1980s, such as:
J-7 & J-8. |
3rd | Circa 1960-1970 aircraft, such as:
F-4. | Aircraft deployed in 1990s-2000s, such as:
J-10 & J-11. |
4th | Circa 1970-1990 aircraft, such as:
F-15 & F-16. | Aircraft deployed in 2010s, such as:
J-20. |
5th | Circa 1990-present aircraft, such as:
F-22 & F-35. | N/A |
The Chengdu J-20 marks the first entry of a multirole stealth fighter into China’s armed forces. According to the Department of Defense (DOD), China views stealth technology as a core component in the transformation of its air force from “a predominantly territorial air force to one capable of...
chinapower.csis.org
That statement there about critical thinking is a rare candid admission by RST about his own methods & needs to be bookmarked for future reference which I've just done. It's funny how when a man's under the cosh, he blurts out the truth, however inadvertently, projecting it on others.
Signs of pathological lying? Nah..
Only story telling.
So some member here has benefited from RST's pearls of wisdom. Some time back some famous analyst from a reputed TT & a former or serving General from the IA both of whom shall remain unknown - for obvious reasons, benefited from his wisdom too.
How come I don't get credit for basing my posts on his only to debunk those posts? Sigh! It's truly an unfair world.
Some yrs ago we were given a glimpse into RST's thought process where he claimed he could offer three perspectives for any development program 1.) The scientist version from the R&D lab 2.) The user's perspective & 3.) The outsider's perspective .
He also claimed that it can all get very confusing at times to lay people. Left unsaid was he was never confused as he doesn't belong to the lay people category. Now certain unkind uncharitable folk would term this 3 perspective roop darshan as MPD - multiple personality disorder, but what do they know?
The rest of #4479 is to be read as Resident Storyteller's confession masquerading as an accusation or J'accuse as it used to be in the French Revolution.