This is not a new revelation to you, is it? We have been discussing the competence of DRDO for far too long. The point is, its changing drastically. We now have all the testing infrastructure, industry maturity, and best of all a long trial and error experience. They demonstrated the interception of a target moving at 7.4km/sec on exo-atmospheric with an accuracy of 10cm. And made a tiktok sized video of interception for the naysayers. Can you fathom how big of a technical challenge it is? And they made it using parts of already proven missiles which took three decades of grudging BM/SAM development. Talking about speed, the entire project took 31 months !. And you think they can't develop contemporary ATGMs?My issue with DRDO and Indian MIC is usually that they tend to do a lot of "science projects" but their products seldom hit the market.
Take Nag. It started in 1988 and till date there is almost nothing to show. I am not sure if there is a single missile system (NAMICA and missiles) deployed with Indian Army.
Contrast this with Spike, its design started in late 1970s. Some variants entered production in 1980s.
Right now we are talking about SANT, Nag MPATGAM, HELINA and NAMICA mounted version. Its like work on NAG Mk2 has started and first one has been tested without even HELINA (I guess now called Dhruvastra) entering production.
In my opinion, we have now entered the second stage of Indian missile development. Where everything seems fast-tracked because of the overall maturity of the ecosystem. Even some SMBs are coming up with their own ATGMS and SAMs!. Just look at the QRSAM development story, In less than 3 years it has been successfully tested 8 times !. That's unheard of.
Your comparison with Israel only shows your naivety on how the world works. Israel is a tiny rich state with the backing of a lone superpower. Their everyday survival depends on having the best military technology. We had/have far bigger or basic problems like feeding the population. Our military projects used to run on a shoestring budget with leftover talent. Passing judgment can be self-fulfilling but once in awhile look at the good side.Here is a brief comparison between Spike development and Indian Nag development :
Main Source
![]()
Dead Tanks: Why Israel's Spike Missile Is so Good
Key point: Ever since it was first used, the Spike missile has made its name known. Here’s why it outclasses so many other anti-tank systems. On October 6, 1973, over eight hundred tanks from three mechanized infantry divisions poured over the Israeli border into the Golan Heights. The sheer...nationalinterest.org
Spike :
1. Need Felt after 1973 conflict with tank columns rolling onto Israel.
2. By 1981 Tammuz (Spike-NLOS) was operational with Pereh vehicle. This was first surface to surface use of TV-Guided missile. It was so successful that even UK, Germany and South Korea imported it in both ATGM and anti artillery roles.
Nag:
1. Design started in 1988. First tested in 1990.
2. Till date neither Nag nor NAMICA has entered production. NO variant of Nag (AFAIK) are operational. No export made, obviously.
Spike :
1. In 1992, Spike MR was tested for first time.
2. In 2000, Spike MR was exported to Finland.
Nag :
1. In 2018, MPATAGM was tested.
2. Devil knows when it will see any induction. Lets not even talk about export.
Spike:
1. In 2010, Spike ER was imported by italy for use on A129 helicopters.
Helina:
2. Till 2020, HELINA/Dhruvastra is still not operational after devil knows how many tests. HELINA's range is also less than Spike.

What else do you expect this why its taking 32 years.


