To the UPG standard ?Things are in public domain. Last Mig-29s were upgraded in 2019-20.
To the UPG standard ?Things are in public domain. Last Mig-29s were upgraded in 2019-20.
This is quite a good article about the whole situation: RD-33: Engines That Power Pakistan's JF-17 Thunder To Be Manufactured In India; HAL Gets MOD ContractHave we signed or signing deal to make RD 33 mk engines in India in 2024 ?
Earlier the plan was to begin retirement from 2027 onwards. Now IAF is giving it another extension by a decade. So now the Mig-29UPG fleet will begin their retirement from 2037 onwards.If we buying engines for Mig 29 Upg & navy Mig 29k , then we are extending the life..
Yup.If we extending life for 15 years, then upgrading also makes sense..
Yes, and then upgrade these mothballed Fulcrums with Indian avionics and subsystems. Mig-29 has impressed IAF over Ladakh/Himalayas. Its impressive TWR and quick reaction has kept the Chinese at bay. Hell, IAF has even used Navy's Mig-29K in that theatre!If we have a indigenous Upgrade program for Mig 29 , then buying the unused Russian frames to add a squadron also make sense .
No, no...no! The 97MK1A is one of the best decisions IAF ever took. The current situation is only temporary. Tejas programme is too important for us. It shall continue.We can hedge this against the additional 97 Mk1A. By the time 83 mk1A is made, I guess Mk2 will be ready??
Even if Mig-29 UPG is a high-end jet compared with MK1A, still we should continue with Tejas as it forms the base of our military aviation complex.@Rajput Lion how will be the Mig 29 Mki with uttam radar + indian avionics compared vs additional 97 Mk1A tender?
It's a gradual step up from 83MK1A to 97 MK1A to *over* 200 MK2 to AMCA/TEDBF. All are necessary.I am ok with moving to Mk2 from 83 Mk1A,
Because of delays in Mk1A due limiting production rate of F404 . .
Absolutely.Both Mk1A production at HAL and upgrade of Mig 29 at IAF BRD can happen simultaneously.
This is quite a good article about the whole situation: RD-33: Engines That Power Pakistan's JF-17 Thunder To Be Manufactured In India; HAL Gets MOD Contract
As per some other reports 15 engines have already been delivered under this new contract.
Earlier the plan was to begin retirement from 2027 onwards. Now IAF is giving it another extension by a decade. So now the Mig-29UPG fleet will begin their retirement from 2037 onwards.
Yup.
Yes, and then upgrade these mothballed Fulcrums with Indian avionics and subsystems. Mig-29 has impressed IAF over Ladakh/Himalayas. Its impressive TWR and quick reaction has kept the Chinese at bay. Hell, IAF has even used Navy's Mig-29K in that theatre!
No, no...no! The 97MK1A is one of the best decisions IAF ever took. The current situation is only temporary. Tejas programme is too important for us. It shall continue.
Even if Mig-29 UPG is a high-end jet compared with MK1A, still we should continue with Tejas as it forms the base of our military aviation complex.
It's a gradual step up from 83MK1A to 97 MK1A to *over* 200 MK2 to AMCA/TEDBF. All are necessary.
Absolutely.
Considering the timeline of upgrade aircraft, the Mig-29UPG will start retiring by the end of this decade and will be completed in the early 2030s. It is best to retire these Soviet-era aircraft fast.
Have we signed or signing deal to make RD 33 mk engines in India in 2024 ?
If we buying engines for Mig 29 Upg & navy Mig 29k , then we are extending the life..
If we extending life for 15 years, then upgrading also makes sense..
If we have a indigenous Upgrade program for Mig 29 , then buying the unused Russian frames to add a squadron also make sense .
We can hedge this against the additional 97 Mk1A. By the time 83 mk1A is made, I guess Mk2 will be ready??
@Rajput Lion how will be the Mig 29 Mki with uttam radar + indian avionics compared vs additional 97 Mk1A tender?
I am ok with moving to Mk2 from 83 Mk1A,
Because of delays in Mk1A due limiting production rate of F404 . .
Both Mk1A production at HAL and upgrade of Mig 29 at IAF BRD can happen simultaneously.
Not just the radar, but IN's MiG-29K fleet will also receive a new mission computer, is in works since '21. That's so bcoz Russia held back the source code and IN wants to integrate Astra and NASM with their K/KUBs. Hopefully the UPGs get the same upgrades.May be put Uttam in all these UPGs along with our new dual-band IRST and then it'll become a kickass upgrade.
I definitely think that there is plan to replace Mig-29K's radar with Uttam MK2. It definitely can be done in the IAF's Mig-29s as well!
There are also plans to put Indian mission computers in UPG along with K versions. That will allow us to put any weapons we may want with our Mig-29s. Regarding RCS, well last year DL, Jodhpur already tested a new-gen RAM paint/spray on Mig-29 UPG and it reduced its RCS significantly. So post this UPG2 upgrade, Mig-29s may have even more advantages over MK1A than now!Mig-29's better when it comes to flight performance; acceleration, climb, endurance etc. LCA is better everywhere else, especially more weapons options apart from maintenance and cost. Avionics can more or less be the same.
Absolutely, 97 MK1A is an excellent decision. Just hope we order 36 Rafale F4.2s along with Navy's 26 Rafale-M immediately without waiting for MRFA. More Rafales and Su-57 derivatives are the only two things lacking for us against PLAAF.Mk2 will be late. Assuming it flies in 2027, it should be ready for squadron deliveries by 2033. The 97 1As will bridge the gap between 2029 and 2033.
There are also plans to put Indian mission computers in UPG along with K versions. That will allow us to put any weapons we may want with our Mig-29s. Regarding RCS, well last year DL, Jodhpur already tested a new-gen RAM paint/spray on Mig-29 UPG and it reduced its RCS significantly. So post this UPG2 upgrade, Mig-29s may have even more advantages over MK1A than now!
View attachment 35258
Absolutely, 97 MK1A is an excellent decision. Just hope we order 36 Rafale F4.2s along with Navy's 26 Rafale-M immediately without waiting for MRFA. More Rafales and Su-57 derivatives are the only two things lacking for us against PLAAF.
Agree. Imo the IAF should have prioritized the M29 for upgrades back in the 90s and kept the M21 as a second line fighter. Maybe even acquire a few dozen from ex-Soviet countries.Do not use a Soviet airframe longer than the Soviets, despite what certification their OEMs give.
The Soviets hardly operated Mig21 airframes beyond 20-25 years. We operated the same designs for 35+ years resulting in so many mishaps.
When Lockheed Martin says 12,000 hours on F16 USAF and others actually do it., not the same as Mikoyan Gurevich signing off documents for life extension.
Aren't we doing that nowCan we fund Mk2, Amca, Tedbf - R&D
Su 30, Mig 29 - upgrade s
Procurement of mk1A & Rafales
all at the same time? that's almost entire IAF?
Mig-21 retirement is imminent. Upgraded Jaguar may last for one more decade and upgraded Mig-29s even more than that.we can finally retire legacy outdated Mig 21, Jaguars , Mig 29 squads in the coming decade.
I have only one caption, 'Confidence dekho launde ki'.
It looks like a Wraith hiveship !
There are also plans to put Indian mission computers in UPG along with K versions. That will allow us to put any weapons we may want with our Mig-29s. Regarding RCS, well last year DL, Jodhpur already tested a new-gen RAM paint/spray on Mig-29 UPG and it reduced its RCS significantly. So post this UPG2 upgrade, Mig-29s may have even more advantages over MK1A than now!
View attachment 35258
Absolutely, 97 MK1A is an excellent decision. Just hope we order 36 Rafale F4.2s along with Navy's 26 Rafale-M immediately without waiting for MRFA. More Rafales and Su-57 derivatives are the only two things lacking for us against PLAAF.
just a question but if theres a war with pakistan what role will our jaguar aircrafts play?
for deep stikes its gonna be mirage 2000 and its not a multirole aircraft for air to air combat, so only maritime petrol with its anti ship missiles ?
thanks for the answer, just one more thing can we also use it as how the russians are using su 25 which is for CAS?Jaguar is our primary deep penetration strike aircraft. Twin engine, armored, low level penetration, and now comes with advanced avionics, including an AESA radar, an internal EW suite and sensor fusion. Its only drawback is its weak engine, which creates problems at medium altitude, but that's fine against Pakistan in the plains.
It cannot perform air combat missions, but carries the ASRAAM for self defense. The martime version and the new DARIN IIIs can perform sea strike.
It can carry a specialized American anti-armor cluster weapon called CBU-105. An armored cockpit and 2 30mm cannons gives it an A-10 like strafing capability. So it's excellent for pretty much any strike mission, including SEAD/DEAD and has a nuclear role.