It depends on the aspect. A sphere has a fully curved surface so it has very low RCS compared to a radar antenna. ASRAAM missile has the least RCS of any missile in the world with 0.001m^2 RCS from the front. Its RCS is mainly due to the tail fins. Most other missiles have bigger and larger number of control surfaces which add to their RCS. the IRST of the Su-57 has same kind of coating as the canopy has to reduce RCS. So it is very much possible to reduce the RCS of even an IRST.If having an IIR AAM on a wing-tip increases RCS by 0.05m^2, how can an aircraft having an even larger IRST bubble on the front have an RCS of less than 0.001m^2? @vstol Jockey
The tail fins are swept back and I'd swear you said before that they had an RCS or something like 0.01-0.1m^2. The canopy is swept back, the IRST system is facing straight forward. All I'm saying is show me another stealth aircraft with an IRST system that looks like that.It depends on the aspect. A sphere has a fully curved surface so it has very low RCS compared to a radar antenna. ASRAAM missile has the least RCS of any missile in the world with 0.001m^2 RCS from the front. Its RCS is mainly due to the tail fins. Most other missiles have bigger and larger number of control surfaces which add to their RCS. the IRST of the Su-57 has same kind of coating as the canopy has to reduce RCS. So it is very much possible to reduce the RCS of even an IRST.
They seem to have covered over the exposed nacelles too although difficult to see from that angle.
Maybe they'll even change the IRST so that it actually looks like a stealth aircraft some day.
Only if you don't do the R&D to fix that.I've heard having an angled glass instead of a fish-eye type one (round) gives optical distortions at certain angles.
The real eye catcher however is the new paint scheme, with the hints on the new UCAV.
They want to purchase 2 planes (as earlier with Mirage 2000) :