Project 75 India Diesel-electric Submarine Programs (SSK) : Updates and Discussions

Who will win the P75I program?

  • L&T and Navantia

    Votes: 13 37.1%
  • MDL and TKMS

    Votes: 9 25.7%
  • It will get canceled eventually

    Votes: 13 37.1%

  • Total voters
    35
chinasubsound.jpg


The one mentioned as Type 095 is actually the Type 093A, Shang 2. There's now a Type 093B and obviously the successor, the Type 095.

The 093 and 093A aren't good.

“The 93B is not to be confused with the 93. It is a transition platform between the 93 and the forthcoming 95,” said Jerry Hendrix, director of the Defense Strategies and Assessments Program at the Center for a New American Security—who is also a former U.S. Navy Captain. “It is quieter and it has a new assortment of weapons to include cruise missiles and a vertical launch capability. The 93B is analogous to our LA improved in quietness and their appearance demonstrates that China is learning quickly about how to build a modern fast attack boat.”

So at least unofficial assessments put it in the same category as the Improved LA class or the Akula II.

Anyway, after building experimental subs, they are now entering the mass production stage, which means their subs are now competitive.

While I doubt they are at the Virgnia's level yet, probably not even close to the Yasen, but they could be just half a decade or so behind.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Amarante
The one mentioned as Type 095 is actually the Type 093A, Shang 2. There's now a Type 093B and obviously the successor, the Type 095.

The 093 and 093A aren't good.

“The 93B is not to be confused with the 93. It is a transition platform between the 93 and the forthcoming 95,” said Jerry Hendrix, director of the Defense Strategies and Assessments Program at the Center for a New American Security—who is also a former U.S. Navy Captain. “It is quieter and it has a new assortment of weapons to include cruise missiles and a vertical launch capability. The 93B is analogous to our LA improved in quietness and their appearance demonstrates that China is learning quickly about how to build a modern fast attack boat.”

So at least unofficial assessments put it in the same category as the Improved LA class or the Akula II.

Anyway, after building experimental subs, they are now entering the mass production stage, which means their subs are now competitive.

While I doubt they are at the Virgnia's level yet, probably not even close to the Yasen, but they could be just half a decade or so behind.
🐂💩💩💩 93B as quite as Akula 2 🤣
it's not even close to Akula 1.....Nationalinterest.org 😒
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Bon Plan
Yeah they were probably the sole bidder, there was a filing notif few months ago.

Heavyweight torpedo dcpp sought for the P-75 btw, tender out today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marich01
Scorpene-Evolved-Indonesia-Li-Ion-1024x649.jpg.webp



full LIBs configuration, the Scorpene Evolved will have a total endurance of 80 days (with 78 of those submerged), an operational range of more than 8,000 nautical miles, a lower indiscretion rate, and maintain top speed longer. This can be achieved because LIBs can store and deliver more energy with shorter charging times than lead-acid batteries.
 

The S-81 submarine ‘Isaac Peral’ sails at the maximum operational depth before its commissioning to the Spanish Navy


S81-5-2-scaled.jpg


The S-81 submarine ‘Isaac Peral’ has successfully overcome the last safety milestone with navigation at the maximum operational depth, before its commissioning to the Navy. With the participation of Navantia, the Navy and the Ministry of Defence, this test took place last Tuesday. Therefore, the submarine has completed a major milestone and it will continue to undergo various tests until its final delivery.

The S-80 submarine construction programme thus consolidates itself as a strongly powerful product in the international market and also positions Navantia as a spearhead in the military submarine navigation.

The programme for the construction of four S-80 submarines for the Navy is a huge technological leap for Navantia, the Navy and the Spanish industry. With the execution of this ambitious programme, Navantia becomes a Technical Design Authority and as such it participates in the new Technical Office (OTACV), which will implement a new support methodology.

The president of Navantia, Ricardo Domínguez, has expressed his gratitude to the participants in this programme: “Sailing at maximum operational depth is a symbolic moment for all those who are involved: the Ministry of Defence, the Navy, Navantia personnel and the collaborating industry. It is, therefore, an excellent moment to recognize everyone’s work because, with the S-81, not only Navantia makes a qualitative leap forward, but Spain makes also a qualitative leap forward in its defence capabilities and in its industrial and technological base”.
 
Has an official RFP been issued yet or are we still waiting? I've been digging around for it but couldn't find official confirmation. If not, has any reasoning been given why this has been delayed for so many years?

This is one area that is critical to get right, many of the hulls India is operating are from the early-mid 80s! From steel cutting to induction will take at least 10 years per vessel...
 
  • Like
Reactions: YoungWolf
Scorpene-Evolved-Indonesia-Li-Ion-1024x649.jpg.webp



full LIBs configuration, the Scorpene Evolved will have a total endurance of 80 days (with 78 of those submerged), an operational range of more than 8,000 nautical miles, a lower indiscretion rate, and maintain top speed longer. This can be achieved because LIBs can store and deliver more energy with shorter charging times than lead-acid batteries.

They went full Taigei.
 
Has an official RFP been issued yet or are we still waiting? I've been digging around for it but couldn't find official confirmation. If not, has any reasoning been given why this has been delayed for so many years?

This is one area that is critical to get right, many of the hulls India is operating are from the early-mid 80s! From steel cutting to induction will take at least 10 years per vessel...

Since it's an SPM program, the process is different. RFP was issued in 2021. Most contenders have already quit. Sweden didn't wanna give away tech. France and Russia couldn't meet RFP requirements. Korea likely left due to pressure from China. Japan's constitution is problematic. Since only Spain qualified, the MoD gave the Germans more time to design their sub. The Germans had originally asked for a year, which MoD denied.

So now we have L&T with Spain and MDL with Germany left. They signed teaming agreements in July last year.

So the RFP stage is still going on. The formal bidding and tech evaluations will begin this year. The winner is also very likely to be chosen within the year.