Haven't we already developed non magnetic steel ? Why should we depend on ze Germans for it ? Ofc quality wise it may be a different matter.If the Germans didn't part with non-mag tech for close ally Israel, we ain't gettin' it for sure.
Haven't we already developed non magnetic steel ? Why should we depend on ze Germans for it ? Ofc quality wise it may be a different matter.If the Germans didn't part with non-mag tech for close ally Israel, we ain't gettin' it for sure.
If the Germans didn't part with non-mag tech for close ally Israel, we ain't gettin' it for sure.
In wartime, SSKs will generally stay close to the coast where deep diving capability isn't a factor. If they surface to snorkel, they lose the element of surprise.Long long ago, I read non magnetic isn't suitable to us.. It cannot dive deeper I think.
DMRL/SAIL have developed DMR-249B steel for sub applications but there's no open source info on its properties. If it was up to non-mag spec, we'd have already used it to build the Arihant class imo.Haven't we already developed non magnetic steel ? Why should we depend on ze Germans for it ? Ofc quality wise it may be a different matter.
Privatisation is out of the question imo. The trade unions would throw a hissy fit, egged on by political parties across states (esp WB and KL). Strikes could impact delivery schedules and push up costs.Instead of cultivating another yard why don't we amalgamate all public shipyards into 2 DPSUs - the East Coast Shipyards Ltd & the West Coast Shipyards Ltd , corporatize it if it isn't already so & eventually list it in the market with a view to privatizing it
DMRL/SAIL have developed DMR-249B steel for sub applications but there's no open source info on its properties. If it was up to non-mag spec, we'd have already used it to build the Arihant class imo.
Submarine Material
Mishra Dhatu Nigam along with NMRL is working on making special alloy which will not have any ferro magnetic property and at same time will have strong hull than Arihant class submarines.
It's either this or they wither away if not now , later.Privatisation is out of the question imo. The trade unions would throw a hissy fit, egged on by political parties across states (esp WB and KL). Strikes could impact delivery schedules and push up costs.
Iirc, one time GRSE workers went on indefinite strike forcing the IN to tow ships undergoing maintenance/construction to MDL. If it happened all over, the IN's fleet serviceability would hit rock bottom. Don't think GoI would have the appetite for another round of street protests.
If the Germans didn't part with non-mag tech for close ally Israel, we ain't gettin' it for sure.
Scorpene was studied by Naval Group and Navantia, but mainly Naval Group (Navantia had poor sub experience).what is the degree of commonality b/w Scorpene and S-80?
It seems there was this error of decimal thing that led to Navantia running to Electric Boat for help.Scorpene was studied by Naval Group and Navantia, but mainly Naval Group (Navantia had poor sub experience).
Ater a dispute about export (if I remember well) they all two decided to cut the tie.
S80 was then studied by Spain on the Scorpene lessons, but the studients were not clever and aware enough it seems....
S80 father is Scorpene.
Titanium for a conventional sub doesn't make sense but a Ti-hulled SSN could well be a possibility.Yeah. We can always switch to titanium over time in future subs.
I think L&T has already demonstrated that with its handling of the ICG Vikram OPV project. As things stand today, the GoI/MoD is busy handing out orders on to DPSU yards while L&T is literally begging for scraps- subcontracting for the likes of GRSE.We cannot corporatize unless private sector comes in first and they show off a level of efficiency DPSUs cannot. This will give the ammo necessary to kill the unions.
When I make a decimal error, I don't call General Electric to help me: I correct my mistake and recalculate.It seems there was this error of decimal thing that led to Navantia running to Electric Boat for help.
Pretty sure it was the GDEB which showed Navantia the misplaced decimal, until then the Spaniards were clueless about why their sub couldn't resurface after diving down. It delayed their submarine programme by 5 years at least.When I make a decimal error, I don't call General Electric to help me: I correct my mistake and recalculate.
That decimal error business suits the RoI more than Spain . Something much more serious transpired there which we'd probably get to know one fine day courtesy a biography or an expose in the media.When I make a decimal error, I don't call General Electric to help me: I correct my mistake and recalculate.
Titanium for a conventional sub doesn't make sense but a Ti-hulled SSN could well be a possibility.
Titanium for a conventional sub doesn't make sense but a Ti-hulled SSN could well be a possibility.
I think L&T has already demonstrated that with its handling of the ICG Vikram OPV project. As things stand today, the GoI/MoD is busy handing out orders on to DPSU yards while L&T is literally begging for scraps- subcontracting for the likes of GRSE.
Granted, some pvt players like Reliance Naval and ABG have turned out to be damp squibs in terms of meeting timelines but performers like L&T should not be penalized because of it.
The L1 regime will continue to be a disadvantage imo unless the recently announced PLI scheme for shipbuilding saved margins for pvt yards.
Also MoD awarding contracts on nomination basis must stop.