They tried to take it, they failed, and then they retreated and are now pretending that it was what they wanted to do in the first place. That's ridiculous.Pretty much what I said earlier. The Russians never intended to take Kiev. Plus the fact that victory or defeat will be decided on the table.
Russia attacked the Donbas first by setting up terrorist militia to try to overthrow Ukrainian control.As per Baud, it was the opposite. Ukraine attacked Donbas, and that began on the 16th.
They weren't disenfranchised. That's a bunch of bullshit. There was a bill proposed, that didn't even actually pass, that made Ukrainian the sole official language. Everybody is bilingual anyway because these two languages are so close that when you speak one, you can grasp the other pretty quickly.Donbas stopped being a Ukrainian matter the minute they decided to disenfranchise Russians. Meaning they stopped having any good intentions for the Donbas region anymore. It's enough for the international community to protect the separatists legally.
Anyway if that's disenfranchisement, what should we say about the situation in Kashmir? With the total blackout imposed on the population and so on? Pretty clear that it's enough for the international community to protect the Kashmiri legally by assisting a Pakistani invasion, right?
Putin explicitly demanded a return to 1997 borders, before NATO expansion. Why would he want to have the Baltic states, Poland, Bulgaria, and Romania out of NATO if he's only interested in Russian-speaking people?Not really. They actually want territories of Russian-speaking people.