Ukraine - Russia Conflict

screambowl said:
1. Ukr is bankrupt by now. They can't afford the weapons.

2. So the numerical superiority of substandard weapon systems has kept NATO at bay past two months that East Ukr is still under Russian occupancy. Their strategy is working.

American source is not required.
Click to expand...
War reparations - the seized assets of Russia will be used to pay for the damage. They broke it, they fix it.

Considering Russia is supposed to be a superpower and they tried to take Kyiv and the entire country, and its end game is Moldova, Ukraine is doing pretty well.

Comparison of Ukraine and Russia Military Strengths (2024)

Comparison of two world military powers in side-by-side format.
www.globalfirepower.com

I'm sorry, you obviously prefer listening to and reading complete BS.
 

Denmark will hand over Piranha III armored personnel carriers to Ukraine. This was reported by a local newspaper specializing in defense OLFI. According to journalists, the Armed Forces will receive 25 such vehicles.
Click to expand...
 
Part 253. "They have very clear artillery!"
Click to expand...

Interception of conversations of occupiers: "Here such massacre, a cunt * torn here in general"

"In short, you'll see all this bullshit there."
Click to expand...

More Disintegrated Integrated Air Defence

 
BMD said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1520779037513330689
Click to expand...
Russia has no idea what's coming this summer.

I think if Russia uses a tactical nuke at a Ukraine defensive line so that Russia can push the US would retaliate conventionally with Tomahawks and a massive airstrike inside Ukraine of Russian forces. I don't think the US would need to use nukes themselves they can obliterate Russian forces inside Ukraine by conventional means. It would likely be the last and only time Russia uses nukes inside Ukraine.

I just started chuckling knowing that he's reading this just wanting to respond to this post with insults. :LOL:
 
www.yahoo.com

Russia planned downing passenger jet, blaming Ukraine Security Service of Ukraine

Valentyna Romanenko - Sunday, 1 May 2022, 12:09 The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) claims to have apprehended a Russian sabotage and reconnaissance group that was preparing to shoot down a passenger plane and blame it on the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the international partners supplying arms...
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com
Hydra said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1520773616375193606
Click to expand...
1651421437198.png


1651421474451.png
 
BMD said:
War reparations - the seized assets of Russia will be used to pay for the damage. They broke it, they fix it
Click to expand...

Russia has captured east regions of Ukr and created economic crisis in EU which is creating pressure on NATO, not otherwise. What you have said, may not happen in near future. There are few pockets of areas of Ukr-resistance force, but majorly everything has been captured by the Ru army.
BMD said:
Considering Russia is supposed to be a superpower and they tried to take Kyiv and the entire country, and its end game is Moldova, Ukraine is doing pretty well.
Click to expand...
I don't think Russia tried to take Kyiv , that was suppose to be a diversion.
 
screambowl said:
I don't think Russia tried to take Kyiv , that was suppose to be a diversion.
Click to expand...

Ukraine - Russia Conflict

I'm not sure if they are getting the tactical strike missile I think it's just the MLR's which itself has a good range but it wouldn't surprised me if they did "accidently" delivered a handful of these long range missiles quietly under the condition Russian territory doesn't get hit. I dunno...
www.strategicfront.org www.strategicfront.org
The oryxspioenkop.com tally of material losses shows 587 Russian armoured fighting vehicles (tanks, infantry vehicles) lost from the 5th (final end of the Battle of Kiev) to the 28th of April, out of a total of 1,622, equating to the equipping of one battle group (40 armoured fighting vehicles) every two days, compared to one BG per day previously. These are only the verified casualties, the actual losses can be estimated to be about 50% higher. The proportion of destroyed vehicles is now 2/3 and the proportion of abandoned vehicles is much reduced. The Russians lost only 72 artillery pieces in April, compared with twice as many previously, and 200 trucks compared with 600. This evolution reflects the disaster that the battle of Kiev represented for the Russians - transformed into a diversionary operation by the propaganda - and the evolution of the fighting.
Click to expand...
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BMD
www.blick.ch

Jetzt töten sich Putins Truppen schon gegenseitig

Die Tschetschenen galten vor wenigen Wochen noch als *censored* in Putins Arsenal. Doch welche Rolle die brutalen Krieger genau haben, ist bis heute nicht klar. Nun sollen sie sogar auf russische Truppen geschossen haben, behauptet die Ukraine.
www.blick.ch www.blick.ch
Chechen and Buryat soldiers are said to have clashed. A story about booty and the distribution of roles in the war.
According to these reports, a fight took place between Kadyrov's Chechens and troops from Buryatia, another autonomous republic of Russia, in the Russian-occupied village of Kiselivka in the Kherson region. About 50 soldiers from both sides were reportedly involved. The Ukrainian Ministry of Defence wrote that there were deaths and injuries, without giving more precise information.

Several reasons are put forward to explain the fighting. On the one hand, the Chechens are said to have stolen a booty that the Buryats had made earlier.

But above all, it was an ethnic conflict. While the Buryats, who were once part of Genghis Khan's Mongol empire, are fighting on the front line, the Chechens have to wait in the background. Their main task, reports Ukraine, is to motivate their own troops to continue fighting. In other words: shoot down deserters. It is not clear whether this division of roles no longer suited the Buryats or whether they felt they had a better chance of fighting the Chechens than the Ukrainians. In any case, this is one more story that shows how low the morale of Putin's army is.
Click to expand...

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMD
randomradio said:
Interesting to note the troops in the North retreated pretty much when the South was taken.
Click to expand...
Thrust towards Kiev was always a feint, but thrust towards kharkiv was import. It would have cut the deep defences Ukrainians have set up against any push from east. Russians failed there terribly.

Russians need to get their act together and start using artillery fire then combination of infantry and armour moving forward , clear the areas , secure rear , set up supplies and repeat.

While the west needs to ensure that atleast 2-3 more capital ships of Russia is sunk. A battery of Harpoon will be enough. Instead of fighter jets supply them your harpoons for God sake.

The RQ4 is important asset , sink everything hostile.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom