Girkin and Prigozhin all alone lol.
Except it's not remotely like an insurgency. In insurgencies like Iraq and Afghanistan the losses were only around 3k over 2 decades. Russia loses that in a week in Ukraine.Yeah, I had brought this up very early during the war, that nothing good will happen if the Russians don't finish it quickly.
You either de-militarise really quickly, or it's gonna turn into a slow never-ending grind just like an insurgency. It's a problem for everybody, not just the two belligerents.
Except it's not remotely like an insurgency. In insurgencies like Iraq and Afghanistan the losses were only around 3k over 2 decades. Russia loses that in a week in Ukraine.
Look at the map in background!
But the loss rates are 1000x higher than an insurgency. And the material costs and hence financial costs are higher by an even larger amount.Point being the main losses are soldiers, like in an insurgency. 'Cause if it's drawn-out, you can rebuild material losses, but can't replace quality soldiers as quickly as that.
What in particular?
Look at the map in background!
But the loss rates are 1000x higher than an insurgency. And the material costs and hence financial costs are higher by an even larger amount.
Yeah, no it wasn't, total in Iraq was 25k, mostly Iraqi security forces of new government... over 20 years.The insurgencies you are referring to are in much weaker parts of the globe involving much smaller number of soldiers, so it appears less. So you are underestimating the potential of an insurgency.
If you look at Afghanistan and Iraq, the total dead on the US side was 100k in Afghanistan and 200k in Iraq.
Not sure you had one. This is not an insurgency war.Anyway, that's not my point.