Are the numbers adequate against PAF? Possibly with the S400 and the upcoming IADS we'll be very much safer.
Pretty soon the MKIs will be upgraded with more modern BVR weapons. Once that happens, we will have hundreds of jets that are superior to anything PAF operates.
Why 'yes'? US stops Pak from threatening nukes but there's no respite from terrorists and ammunition? What about continuous support to local boys to pick up guns and pent stones? If US has stopped Pak's nuke deterrence, and as you claim that we have overwhelming power, what is stopping us from continuously threatening them with retaliatory action?
We are not in the business of optics. Pak used to threaten us with nukes because they needed to keep up their hyphenation with India, and the best way to do that is through nuclear sabre-rattling. This wasn't meant for the Indian govt, or even their domestic audience, it was meant for the international community at large. "Give us money because we are a nuclear power and could end up using them if you do not help us", was their threat to the West.
Words never scared us. We fought a war under the nuclear umbrella and almost went to war twice after. Even today the forces are pushing for war. And we already know that army was already prepared to invade Pakistan in 2019.
Why are we giving much higher impetus to economic strangulation rather than retaliatory strikes?
'Cause it actually works.
Although I think we will add retaliatory strikes to our response since after Balakot. But there have been no major terrorist attacks since Pulwama yet. Pak must be waiting for the Congress to come back to power before they can restart terrorist attacks on India. But this is the problem. If only the BJP can do what's needed, then we need something even the Congress can handle, and economic strangulation is the best bet.
Another advantage is economic strangulation affects everyone in Pakistan, both the rich and the poor, even the PA. Whereas retaliatory strikes, if they happen frequently, the Pakistanis will just normalise it and its shock effect will reduce. We will attack them, they will pretend to attack us, and the story will repeat.
Agreed, lobbing a few glide bombs across LoC is no big deal. But nothing much has changed - so what if IA could send drones across LoC to target PA bunkers?
Things are not adding up.
We used drones to target their bunkers using artillery. Also, we barely have any armed drones. We started operating the very first ones only in 2018, merely 10 of them, and are planning to get a few more. Gotta give it a decade before we get the numbers necessary to make such a decision. But it's not necessary, since the PAF can shoot down drones anyway. We shot down quite a few PAF drones in 2019, including large drones.
Current gen drones are meant for use against an adversary that has no air defences, like terrorists. The actual warfighting drones are still WIP.