Lol. A fight between two broke, not too fit nor agile drunkards. That's what this is.
P. S - I only hope the planners and executors of Op Gaganshakti and those who cheered the so called " findings " from it , derive the right lessons and sober up.
Defence Ministry should seriously consider budgetary allocations of IAF. They should keep bare minimum of 30-40 Su30 and other jets should be sold to some other country and renaming assets to be transferred to Army Aviation Corps and Indian Naval Air arm.
40 is enough to participate in air shows all around the world with showstopper Pugachev Cobra maneuver.
2016 strikes were flawless but in these strikes IAF created more doubts and questions then one can answer. Everything is doubtful and with new information coming in daily it looks like a mess. This is when whole nation was behind you, PM was in your pocket and your adversary was equally incompetent and was numerically overwhelmed. If it was some serious Air force against IAF I don't know what would have happened.
Amazing people they are, want shiny new expensive foreign toys yet keep losing them even in peace time. Indian weapons are strict no and if it was not Parikars forceful shoving down the throat Tejas program would have been scrapped by now. Hardly any example of bad mouthing of own weapons is seen in history. IAF kept sabotaging the project and almost killed it.
Foreign maal obsession also raises questions of commission like Tyagi, we don't know how many such Tyagis are let go silently so as not to defame forces and trust of nation on them. For 2 years Tejas missed WVR target firing Russian missile but all is ignored in name of national interest and nobody ask why is it not working yet? Why we need to rely on that same missile.
Navy and Army has now to clear the mess. I am not asking for proofs of air strike but when a counter proof from 3rd party is available why the hell is those images not released unless they actually missed the target.
F16 were firing AMRAAM but no we should stay back, duck, hide behind ROE, which ROE says to hold back when fired upon? More so when you have superior platform and upper hand? When you are looking only for a tactical victory and not all out war? Why would you let that go?
@vstol Jockey sir were you able to find why we held back that day and why no counter offensive was launched immediately? They planned for 12 days, something "big" is about to happen said US, it's impossible they didn't have taken into account Pakistani counter and our response to that.
I doubt any other PM will give this much of autonomy to IAF again to launch any offensive and more so after this lukewarm result.