Can we know the reason from crashed in the 80s? Appropriate time has passed??Out of the park we should not these full toss go waste. (That's enough trolling before you start hammering me.)
Can we know the reason from crashed in the 80s? Appropriate time has passed??Out of the park we should not these full toss go waste. (That's enough trolling before you start hammering me.)
Can we know the reason from crashed in the 80s? Appropriate time has passed??
And who was held responsible?anyone suspended?HAL babus , MoD officialsHuman Error and Technical Faults , Maintenance mistakes , Manufacturing Defects , Poor quality of spare parts , Bird Hits
Nope.
And that is where the aam Pakistani thinks from his/her backside.
Why would you waste a SOW only to remove its fuzes when you could have achieved the very same result, in the very same area with a dumb bomb tossed up and without fuze at a fraction of the cost?
This is where the average Pakistani is an idiot. And most of Indians too.
The area you have supposedly targeted is next to LC. Easily could be targeted with a LGB from an artillery gun. Or with dumb bombs from PAF without fuzes, and same result would have been achieved.
But my dear sir, PAF used SOWs, from within own territories ... and targets were on LC?
Now I will give you a theory to munch over. Said it earlier too.
1. Primary Targets were Avantipore and Srinagar AFBs.
2. Due to jamming and active CAPs, PAF switched over to secondary targets.
3. Failed to achieve as the same were jammed & failed to 'arm' themselves as they reached the target area.
Nope.
1. Primary Targets were Avantipore and Srinagar AFBs.
2. Due to jamming and active CAPs, PAF switched over to secondary targets.
3. Failed to achieve as the same were jammed & failed to 'arm' themselves as they reached the target area.
I had stated that Baba is an official handle who uses information to at times even mix up things. On 26th we bombed three non military targets. Than we had 27th but Ninda Turtle had talked of three air attacks across LOC. Probably the two sites as told by Baba were targeted in the third unannounced strike. I am not sure. I am just putting two+two together. We do know for sure that after release of Abhi, for next seven days we had done very heavy punitive strikes across LOC. The supposed Brahmos strikes were stopped but the punishment was mated out on secondary targets of Pak Army. Just the way PAF had to alter their main targets.IF, their primary targets were AFBs, then we would have really done very nasty stuff during earlier night bombing and it was not in Balakot but other two sites. Should we believe BABA's tweet?
24 aircraft strike package, three support aircraft and 12 glide bombs. Only to send a message? Your logic will find support only in brainwashed population of Pakistan. India is home to people with much larger IQ.If you close your eyes and truly use your commonsense, you'll realize that Pakistan did not want to actually hit the Indian bases and invite an overwhelming retaliation that it cant survive. It wanted to drop bombs close to the Indian bases to warn our country that it has the capability to hit back and also to show the same to its population.
Those people who are stating the otherwise, their words should be taken with a pinch of salt.
24 aircraft strike package, three support aircraft and 12 glide bombs. Only to send a message? Your logic will find support only in brainwashed population of Pakistan. India is home to people with much larger IQ.
I don't understand why PAF & PA wanted to cause serious damage which would have led to escalation and negative consequences for Pakistan. I don't buy the theory of Pak armed forces' desire to show off martial race supremacy to its public at all costs. Or maybe they do and hence prefer to take things to the edge and then hope to not receive an adequate response.
The ground jamming might be effective only when the guided bombs are close to the jammers. Aircraft jammers might not be so powerful against multiple incoming missiles.Also problem with jamming theory is if you (Su30) can jam so effectively from 70km (let's assume along with ground assets) you can come few Km closer and knock few enemies out when they are taking aim at you (and you are rendering that incoming missile useless with jamming).
Jehadis versus army installations? Hard to believe that anyone can be that mad.We had discussed this long ago.
Pakistan resorted to a knee-jerk reaction, which was pointed out on the same day as the strike took place.
We killed hundreds of terrorists in three different locations, so they had to demonstrate to their jihadi partners that they can resort to punishing strikes as well. Different story that they didn't realise their SOWs would all fail. How else would you explain how their SOWs missed by many kilometers? As much as 3 Km.
The Pakistanis are world famous for knee-jerk reactions.
Pakistani generals do not have a superiority complex. Their whole nuclear bogey is based on the premise that a conventional attack by India, would invite a disproportionate response by Pakistan, which would then escalate to the nuclear level. They took the risk to preserve the sanctity of their doctrine. That they were not able to do any damage is another matter.I don't understand why PAF & PA wanted to cause serious damage which would have led to escalation and negative consequences for Pakistan. I don't buy the theory of Pak armed forces' desire to show off martial race supremacy to its public at all costs. Or maybe they do and hence prefer to take things to the edge and then hope to not receive an adequate response.
And none of those 12 hit their targets? Sorry.. not believable.
Jehadis versus army installations? Hard to believe that anyone can be that mad.
The ground jamming might be effective only when the guided bombs are close to the jammers. Aircraft jammers might not be so powerful against multiple incoming missiles.
As far as the fuses being live on the bombs, the bombs can still be made to miss the targets inspite of live fuses. But won't the bombs explode if the fuses are live even if the bombs miss the targets? If so then why didn't the bombs go off after missing their targets?
PA can support jehadis and mix with them as well to support them. But that is under cover of supposed anonymity. IAF struck terrorist facilities and the GoI emphasised on this point. I don't see why, purely as as a response, should PAF deliberately try to target IA & IAF installations with the intention of causing serious damage. How can they not expect any Indian retaliation?Why so? PA regulars have been fighting the US Army in Afghanistan. Did you forget they fought the Soviet Union for nearly a decade there? Kargil War was the same. They pretended jihadis attacked India instead of regular army.
There really is no difference between PA and the jihadis. And the jihadis expect the PA to protect them anyway.
Can the bombs not explode even if they miss their targets? At least some bombs can explode.The number of bombs don't matter. Only the data links have to be jammed, and PAF uses only one type of link for the Mirages and JF-17s.
PA can support jehadis and mix with them as well to support them. But that is under cover of supposed anonymity.
IAF struck terrorist facilities and the GoI emphasised on this point. I don't see why, purely as as a response, should PAF deliberately try to target IA & IAF installations with the intention of causing serious damage.
How can they not expect any Indian retaliation?
Can the bombs not explode even if they miss their targets? At least some bombs can explode.