I know that IAF desperately need rafale in large number. But even my PM too repeated the same. The thing is that IAF performance is a mediocre, that too against an airforce like PAF, even IAF personal is admitting that PAF had the better strategy on feb 27Which claim ?
Because PM was crucified for months for going ahead on Rafale deal. It's political for him.I know that IAF desperately need rafale in large number. But even my PM too repeated the same. The thing is that IAF performance is a mediocre, that too against an airforce like PAF, even IAF personal is admitting that PAF had the better strategy on feb 27
So you want to tell Prime minister of India has performed some cheep political drama to gain political milage, at the expense of a possible bad interpretation of IAF's operations? That wordings clearly giving the message that IAF would have achieved something big with Rafale, literally telling IAF didn't perform well and asper you PM has made that statement to dodge the opposition. Man you are making a serious allegations, i don't think PM ji will do that.Because PM was crucified for months for going ahead on Rafale deal. It's political for him.
Only thing mediocre that day was the drama of 'Doosra banda'.
Even a Bangladesh airforce with a handful of Mig-29 can pull off the same stunt for 10 minutes in the east.
Their strategy that day was to show force by dropping some bombs across the border. They couldn't even precisely target because of the fast response.
Yes, it is clear as day. Why don't you ask PM ji, if IAF had performed badly that day?. Guess whats the answer is.So you want to tell Prime minister of India has performed some cheep political drama to gain political milage, at the expense of a possible bad interpretation of IAF's operations? That wordings clearly giving the message that IAF would have achieved something big with Rafale, literally telling IAF didn't perform well and asper you PM has made that statement to dodge the opposition. Man you are making a serious allegations, i don't think PM ji will do that.
Doosra or thesra, so far there is only thing which we can tell confident, That is Mig21 got a missile hit inside POK.
If Bangladesh airforce has done such thing in peace time then we can't blame IAF. But thing is that PAF performed their stunt tye very next day after Balakot strike. Even our radars picked the multiple PAF airborne, still it happened.
Even our radars picked the multiple PAF airborne, still it happened.
A formation inside Pakistan airspace does not mean they are going 'destroy' you. Even if they approach LoC/IB you can't do anything. They have to cross 10km buffer which is called 'technical violation'. At this stage our QRF (Mig-21) takes off and Su-30s in south got direction from AWACS to intercept for 'possible' LoC violation.
We never wanted to start a conflict. It was just a training mission where you have to create air Superiority for some minutes. Every air Force do such operations. I don't understand the concept of mig-21 near loc.you have su-30 and where was Tejas? Obviously we want to know more about Tejas. We introduced jf-17 on Feb 27 but we didn't expect mig-21 from your side. Who fly mig-21 these days? Su-30s went cold too early. No indian aerial reinforcement on time.Wondering what kind of logic you are talking? They came with an intention to destroy you, they have dropped ammunition inside your own military complex ( an act of war). I think its a good reason for IAF to shoot down enemy.
I know its hurt, initially i too could not cope with the fact that IAF had lacuna in its preparedness on feb27. Any argument such IAF was not asked, MKI was in low altitude, out numbered all are excuses to pacify our own consciousness.
Forget to add Congress too brought such self pacifying statement on loss of aksaichin in 1962 war.
Airforce needs more Rafale and BVRs. It was a perfect opportunity to make the point. Which they did. Every democratic military does that. You should read congressional reports which justify the budget on military requirements. They would be the biggest losers in your book.
Other than games and nationalist imaginary land, you don't kill half of the enemy formation because they had the 'intention to destroy'. That too in peacetime. In the real world, we live with mutually agreed protocols and ROEs. So that misunderstanding does not lead to actual war. What matters is our strategic goals.
We never wanted to start a conflict. It was just a training mission where you have to create air Superiority for some minutes. Every air Force do such operations. I don't understand the concept of mig-21 near loc.you have su-30 and where was Tejas? Obviously we want to know more about Tejas. We introduced jf-17 on Feb 27 but we didn't expect mig-21 from your side. Who fly mig-21 these days? Su-30s went cold too early. No indian aerial reinforcement on time.
Whatever. Anyway another aerial battle is a possibility. Let's see who wins this time.Our Air force made only One mistake
They failed to Anticipate that PAF would fire Amraam from well within their own territory
Though it didnt cause any loss
Yet it gave them something to brag about Since Su 30s were focused on evading the Amraams
The PANIC that the whole of Pakistani military , society ,PM ,COAS , Media ,
Jokers like Zaid Hamid and his assistant clowns in PDF and elsewhere
SHOW ON A DAILY BASIS
IS PROOF THAT A LOT HAS HAPPENED
AFTER FEB 27 TILL TODAY
The funny thing is you guys cannot show your wounds but the constant CRYING is proof that we have hurt you several times
Whatever. Anyway another aerial battle is a possibility. Let's see who wins this time.
We will come close only if you guarantee that you will face us. Last time,you ran away without facing paf. Don't shy this time. We have very very long range missiles so flying too deep suits our strategy. You should come face to face this time. No more drama. F-16 vs su-30.Tell your PAF to come close
Why this fear
Our UAVs.are freely loitering and sending targetting information to our Artillery Command Posts
We are pounding the shit out of your Army
I can't comment about army. Civilians are dying daily. No information of soldiers dying. We also fly drones,I mean armed drones. We don't want war. Don't make us aggressive again.Tell your PAF to come close
Why this fear
Our UAVs.are freely loitering and sending targetting information to our Artillery Command Posts
We are pounding the shit out of your Army
We will come close only if you guarantee that you will face us. Last time,you ran away without facing paf. Don't shy this time. We have very very long range missiles so flying too deep suits our strategy. You should come face to face this time. No more drama. F-16 vs su-30.
I can't comment about army. Civilians are dying daily. No information of soldiers dying. We also fly drones,I mean armed drones. We don't want war. Don't make us aggressive again.
That one is a biggest blunder from IAF side, not giving importance to pakistani warning on a retaliation and there by didn't put enough fighter on air round the clock is another blunder.Radars picked them up , but the Radar controllers couldn't identify the pattern of build up at early stage, and there you have to give PAF credits or criticize the IAF. They did identify the pattern but after losing ample of time. And by the time SAMs were put on high alert. The friendly fire proves that.
PAF was aggressor so they would have given some blows to IAF. It's alright, and it's not uncommon.
It was neither a training exercise, it was a meticulously planned attack from PAF.I believe ( may be wrong alaso) this was the plan decided by PAF in the event of IAF limited offensive action, and you have executed that plan after balakot. But you also failed to hit the target, instead throw away the ammunition in an agony ( 11 high costly long range precision guided ammunitions).We never wanted to start a conflict. It was just a training mission where you have to create air Superiority for some minutes. Every air Force do such operations. I don't understand the concept of mig-21 near loc.you have su-30 and where was Tejas? Obviously we want to know more about Tejas. We introduced jf-17 on Feb 27 but we didn't expect mig-21 from your side. Who fly mig-21 these days? Su-30s went cold too early. No indian aerial reinforcement on time.
If it is a full scale & without nukes there is no doubt on who will win the war.Whatever. Anyway another aerial battle is a possibility. Let's see who wins this time.
This kid is getting boring to watch. Mig-21 is the interceptor you bozo. Where will it be? in bangalore ? LCA is you to reach border deployment.We never wanted to start a conflict. It was just a training mission where you have to create air Superiority for some minutes. Every air Force do such operations. I don't understand the concept of mig-21 near loc.you have su-30 and where was Tejas? Obviously we want to know more about Tejas. We introduced jf-17 on Feb 27 but we didn't expect mig-21 from your side. Who fly mig-21 these days? Su-30s went cold too early. No indian aerial reinforcement on time.
AWACS and MKIs were on station. Interceptors reached area when bandits crossed the LoC. Same time more MKIs and Mirages took off from various airbases.I disagree. When you slap some on real hard inside their own home. And when you see the same guy coming with few dudes towards you. You immediately become attentive that he is coming to take revenge. Rather you might yourself won't sleep for a day or two when you are involved in a fight, just to be attentive. Any even smallest manoevure by adversary should be taken as warning.
AWACS and MKIs were on station. Interceptors reached area when bandits crossed the LoC. Same time more MKIs and Mirages took off from various airbases.
That is as good as it gets. Its not possible to have dozens fighter in patrol around the clock.
You forgot to add 3 more very. Let me correct it....'We have very very very very very long range missiles so flying too deep suits our strategy.'We have very very long range missiles so flying too deep suits our strategy.