How about refraining from backpedaling. Target was always Indian's threat environment. Where your claim since the last four pages have been Jags good for 20years, and MKI's toast beyond 2025.
Why do you want to generalize?
All aircraft are mission specific. Jaguar cannot be used for SEAD/DEAD, but it can perform strike. So it depends on the target. The Jaguar's job is to deliver a payload in a permissible environment, even if it's localized and temporary. So it doesn't matter even if it's 2060, the Jaguar will continue to remain relevant to the end of its time. It's the AS's job to create a permissible environment, which the MKI most definitely can no longer do.
I do not disagree. We do have a lot of MKI's, but given that IAF does not have the money to buy shiny rafales, F35's or EFT, and will do everything in its power to scuttle homegrown projects (evident with Pc7to extrapolate to LCA). What other viable options remain?
When your new home is missing furniture, you don't go out and buy a new home. No matter how expensive the furniture is, we have no choice but to buy it.
The same with Rafale. Rafale remains a viable option.
Anyway, the LCA numbers may climb to 324 jets.
Also lets not just cherry pick F15C's, let not forget another 219F15E's.
The F-15E cannot create a permissible environment, it's only a strike aircraft.
Off course> because it has two new generations of aircraft's already commissioned.
Naturally, we need to be in that position as well.
I trust the IAF for it's Massive institutional inaction.
The IAF isn't to blame for it. Do you recall the IAF actually expected the FGFA's IOC to be in 2019? They have even argued for a 6-year induction timescale for the FGFA.
We can have this discussion in coming years to see how obsolete the MKI becomes.
Against which target? Against the J-20, the MKI is already obsolete. So even in the Indian scenario, it is obsolete.