Time plays for Rafale.So far Rafale is stuck at 36 and both the opposition as well as Modi's rivals in the BJP are trying their damnedest to make buying more a toxic issue.
The IAF may want stuff, but they don't realize that defense of the country takes second place to political games.
Why would
Unfortunately, thats one of the very few examples we always boast about.
And if we dont accept our weakness, we will never get better.
Teachers clarified my doubts too in India but hardly anyone taught use to use the knowledge in real life. I was a cbse student.
So far Rafale is stuck at 36 and both the opposition as well as Modi's rivals in the BJP are trying their damnedest to make buying more a toxic issue.
The IAF may want stuff, but they don't realize that defense of the country takes second place to political games.
Why would
Unfortunately, thats one of the very few examples we always boast about.
And if we dont accept our weakness, we will never get better.
Teachers clarified my doubts too in India but hardly anyone taught use to use the knowledge in real life. I was a cbse student.
You can blame Modi's suit for this . The "Suit boot ki sarkar" jibe, completely reordered the spending priorities of current government. So Indian defense will have to tolerate this for one more year, hopefully!!So far Rafale is stuck at 36 and both the opposition as well as Modi's rivals in the BJP are trying their damnedest to make buying more a toxic issue.
The IAF may want stuff, but they don't realize that defense of the country takes second place to political games.
Science and engineering are highly professional fields. You learn on the job. And then you have to specialize. Everything you learn may seem important, but has no relevance when you actually hit the floor and start working.
It doesn't matter what kind of essay I make an engineer write, he needs to get his hands dirty if he has to learn and only the working environment provides that. That is the case in India. In western countries, their schools and universities work with many times more funds than we do, so we cannot provide the same kind of learning environment right now.
The Chinese higher education system is as bad as ours, perhaps worse, but look at the strides they have made. It's all due to money. Science and engineering requires a lot of money.
What you are talking about only helps until you leave school. After that it's all up to your environment. For example, New Zealand has a better STEM education system than India does, granted, but where is their space program, where is their defence program, where is their nuclear program? Where is the environment necessary for them to actually take their education to the next level?
'Once you leave school'
this is the Indian mentality that most Indians have and cant come out of without experiencing another education system. In india we think about getting experience in field after leaving school where as in Here as well as most other western nations, students get into field during school and get opportunity to use theory in practice, they get a feel of what they want to do in future by trying different option.
Secondly, why would NZ want to have its own defence or space prog etc when they are taken care off by the US? All the scientists from here in those fields either go to europe or usa.
There are a lot of things wrong in our education system which needs to be changed else we'll keep crying about indigenous system in 2120.
Basically you have the mind of a 3 year old.Both numbers are real and will happen because those are the requirements and were spelt out by the IAF themselves.
India needs 200-250 more Rafale fighters, 36 not enough: IAF chief Arup Raha
“But we have just ordered 36 aircraft and we require more aircraft in this middle weight category to give entire spectrum of capability,” he said, adding that a void has been created in the past because of obsolescence and many of the squadrons will be past their use-by date. “We have already used them for four decades plus. It is time to retire them and get new aircraft… Over the next 10 years, we must have 200-250 aircraft. It has to be balanced out. In the heavy weight spectrum, we have enough. But in the medium weight category, we need to have more. Yes, about 200 will be very good,” he said.
The IAF wants a GTG deal for medium aircraft, 100+ in the initial tranche and will climb to 200 easily. Again, because that's the requirement. What's more interesting, my quote for 200 Rafale was in Feb 2016 while ACM Arup Raha echoed the same in Dec 2016. Wonder what I know when even the ACM says the same thing.
Gripen collapsed into Tejas, so Tejas numbers have climbed from 120+ to 320+.
As for FGFA, it's common sense that any typical large air force's AS numbers are 1/3rd of the squadron strength at the very minimum, that's why MKI is at 270. And that's why FGFA will also climb to those numbers. You forget that the FGFA procurement process itself is a 30-year process.
Basically all my numbers are right. Requirements are gospel.
Basically you have the mind of a 3 year old.
'Mama mama it is true because i heard him say it. So it is true'?
Here is a nice fun game for you. Try to guess the year of the article without going through the link
Deal on AJTs by Sept-end: Tipnis
Tribune News Service
NEW DELHI, Aug 29 — The Indian Air Force (IAF) is expecting that the deal for the purchase of urgently needed Advance Jet Trainers (AJTs) for the training of fighter pilots would be signed with British Aerospace within the next four to six weeks.
Speaking to the newsmen here, the Chief of Air staff, Air Chief Marshal A.Y. Tipnis, however, clarified that even after the signing of the contract, it could well take another two years before the first batch of the AJTs to land in India. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) is looking forward to working out a deal where indigenous serial production of the aircraft could also be undertaken.
India is also looking forward to getting the licence for the indigenous production of one of the country’s frontline fighter aircraft-Mirage-2000. Having already got the aircraft in its inventory, India is not only on the verge of buying another 10 of them but also trying to get the licence for serial production of the aircraft here. The price negotiations for the purchase of Mirage are also in the final stages.
Air Chief Marshal Tipnis, while trying to clarify that there was no problem with the MiGs, specially the MiG-21s which have recently seen a spate of accidents, pointed out that the IAF was definitely “feeling the pinch” in not having the AJTs. He said that the AJTs would have easily filled the gap between the low demand and high demand fighter aircraft.
The main cause of the recent accidents was not technical, but human failure. New pilots, though they were being imparted the best of training, were somehow not being able to cope with the sudden high demand in flying of MiG-21s.
According to him the first of the 123 Mig-21 Bis to be upgraded in India to enhance the operational capabilities of the fighter aircraft will roll out next year and another batch of Sukhoi 30 will join the Indian Air force by 2001-end.
The next batch of the Sukhoi-30 MK I will also be inducted by the end of next year. The induction of the aircraft had not gone according to plan but the process had now been streamlined, he said. The delay was because the IAF wanted to integrate systems from various sources into the aircraft.
Air Chief Marshal Tipnis said the flight refuelling aircraft (FRA), unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and airborne warning and control systems (AWACS) were all a part of the IAF’s plans and it would be acquiring them.
The Air Chief, disturbed at media reports criticising the IAF for the crash of the MiGs, said the ratio of aircraft accidents of MiG-21 vis a vis the total fighter fleet was less than 50 per cent.
He said one-thirds of the total flying of the four categories of aircraft with the IAF was done by fighter planes and more than 50 per cent of flying of warplanes was done by MiG-21s.
“I will continue to fly the Mig 21 till I retire”, the Air Chief, who first got into the cockpit of a Mig-21 in 1963, said emotionally, adding that he considered every pilot as his son and he would not allow them to fly a MiG-21 if he thought that something was wrong with the plane. “The poor old lady is getting a bad name not keeping with her image”.
The Tribune, Chandigarh, India - Nation
'
Forget about aerospace or defense, can you name some innovation coming out of New Zealand? Don't bother listing out New Zealanders achievement outside New Zealand.'Once you leave school'
this is the Indian mentality that most Indians have and cant come out of without experiencing another education system. In india we think about getting experience in field after leaving school where as in Here as well as most other western nations, students get into field during school and get opportunity to use theory in practice, they get a feel of what they want to do in future by trying different option.
Secondly, why would NZ want to have its own defence or space prog etc when they are taken care off by the US? All the scientists from here in those fields either go to europe or usa.
There are a lot of things wrong in our education system which needs to be changed else we'll keep crying about indigenous system in 2120.
Forget about aerospace or defense, can you name some innovation coming out of New Zealand? Don't bother listing out New Zealanders achievement outside New Zealand.
Finland's population is roughly same as New Zealand and I guess I need not mention Finland's contribution to tech world.
BTW, you are not the first one to jump around blaming our education systems or loathe everything "Indian". There are plenty of examples who suddenly feel enlightened after landing in a so called " Western Country".
Forget about aerospace or defense, can you name some innovation coming out of New Zealand? Don't bother listing out New Zealanders achievement outside New Zealand.
Finland's population is roughly same as New Zealand and I guess I need not mention Finland's contribution to tech world.
BTW, you are not the first one to jump around blaming our education systems or loathe everything "Indian". There are plenty of examples who suddenly feel enlightened after landing in a so called " Western Country".
I do not completely agree with you. We definitely need more investment. But that is not always the core issue. Remember most start ups in sillicon valley started in garages with little investment. We seriously lack in two things.Our education system is flawed. It stamps out creativity.
But it's different when it comes to engineering. While Engineering requires creativity, none of that actually comes into play without investment into technologies first. You need a canvas, paint and paint brush before you actually learn how to paint. Engineering is art after all.
I do not completely agree with you. We definitely need more investment. But that is not always the core issue. Remember most start ups in sillicon valley started in garages with little investment. We seriously lack in two things.
1. We always look for quick returns and our risk appetite is extremely low. That is the reason Indian companies grew so fast in services sector while our achievement in products segment is next to nil.
2. In government labs the management is pathetic. The babu culture inherited from British era and further groomed by socialist governments is the biggest hurdle in any innovation.
I worked in a govt R & D lab and we had all the best possible instruments available. I have worked with many MNCs after that, both in India and US. None of them have labs as well equipped as our Indian govt lab. Difficult to believe. But it's a fact.
In govt org, you can order any equipment you need and most likely it will be approved. Once we ordered a protocol analyzer and it was imported and delivered to us within 4-5 months. It costed a whopping 1.3 crores in 2003. On the other hand, if your most brilliant engineer is quitting, as a manager you can't even offer 1 rupee to retain him. MNCs will throw any amount to retain a good guy, but when it comes buying equipment or tools, they are extremely judicious.
Point is, it's not always lack of investment, that hampers innovation in Indian labs. It's the way the money is spent, matters a lot.
I agree that in many domains like aerospace, we need some serious investment in infrastructure.
Apart from that no one can ever dispute the contribution of our Babus in derailing crucial projects !! Their contribution alone overshadows all the other issues combined.
That's the point. I didn't find education being a barrier at any point of time. There is always a scope for improvement. But putting the blame (lack of innovation ) completely on our education system,is BS.Again, apathy has nothing to do with the type of education we are talking about. Bureaucratic apathy is a bane in India. This has more to do with the govt structure than education.
I suppose you were excited to join a govt company and start working, and it's only after that did you see the govt apathy, right? Your education did not instill apathy in you.
There is a reason for the laziness there. The managers there need to ensure projects run for long periods of time. If they end early, then you will no longer get funding.
The start-ups example is bad because pretty much all of it in India is centered around a computer, which is easy enough to purchase. It's the hi-tech stuff that propels a nation forward, that's space, nuclear, biotech, defence etc.
That's the point. I didn't find education being a barrier at any point of time. There is always a scope for improvement. But putting the blame (lack of innovation ) completely on our education system,is BS.
Having said that the recent modifications (in last 10-15 yrs) in Indian education system to reduce stress on students, is pathetic and resulted in deep degradation in quality.
We might be going off topic.I don't know about the second sentence. But school education has to improve a lot. The focus has to shift from rote to creative learning.
Please stop making a fool of yourself and of Armed forces. I did the testing of first ever battery for Kiran aircraft in 1988 and it failed. I wrote down my report and no one had the guts to challenge it.Specifics now mentioned by you, not generalized. That is all that is required. Do not paint the whole organization with one broad stroke. As of yet, does not hold for the armed forces to paint in one broad stroke, like one can paint Police Forces and Politicians.
And no, ASQRs are not tweaked by AF, but tweaked by AF on government directives. That is a case for every acquisition. Be it the Jaguars and Mirages or the Mig 27s and C-17s.