Islamic Republic of Pakistan : News, Discussions & Updates

We can deal with Pak, but not China. Our AF modernisation is screwed up.

Obviously not China, we have no real reason to launch an attack on them (unless at some point in the future they become uniquely vulnerable, offering an opportunity to gain valuable features/territory). But in Pak's case, all we'll need is a decent excuse.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: suryakiran
Pakistan & Egypt had highest rise in research output in 2018

Emerging economies showed some of the largest increases in research output in 2018, according to estimates from the publishing-services company Clarivate Analytics. Egypt and Pakistan topped the list in percentage terms, with rises of 21% and 15.9%, respectively.

China’s publications rose by about 15%, and India, Brazil, Mexico and Iran all saw their output grow by more than 8% compared with 2017 (See ‘Countries with biggest rises in research output’).

Globally, research output rose by around 5% in 2018, to an estimated 1,620,731 papers listed in a vast science-citation database Web of Science, the highest ever (see ‘Research output rose again in 2018’).

d41586-018-07841-9_16357292.jpg

Data: Web of ScienceAnalysis: Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate Analytics

This diversification of players in science is a phenomenal success, says Caroline Wagner, a science and technology policy analyst at Ohio State University, and a former adviser to the US government.

“In 1980, only 5 countries did 90% of all science — the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Japan,” she says. “Now there are 20 countries within the top producing group.”

d41586-018-07841-9_16353120.jpg

Data: Web of ScienceAnalysis: Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate Analytics

The estimates were compiled for Nature by Clarivate, which owns Web of Science, and the analysis focused on 40 countries that have at least 10,000 papers in the database. The whole-year projections are based on the number of research and review papers published between January and August, because there is a time lag between papers being published and them appearing in the database.

Joshua Schnell, a senior adviser at Clarivate based in Rockville, Maryland, says that the results are comparable to annual increases over the past few years, and that the trend is expected to continue into 2019.

Rising in the ranks
It’s not yet clear what has driven the strong gains by Egypt and Pakistan. One reason could be that both countries started from a low base — near the bottom of the list of top 40 countries in overall numbers of papers, says Robert Tijssen, head of science and innovation studies at Leiden University in the Netherlands.

The figures might also reflect changes in how the database is curated, which has added more local or national journals to the mix. But some geographical regions, notably in Africa, are still under-represented, says Tijssen.

Increases in funding and international collaborations might also have boosted the rise in publications in Egypt and Pakistan, say Tijssen and Wagner.

In China, the gains follow two decades of strong policy-driven growth in science and higher education, says Tijssen.

Wagner also expects that China might soon overtake the United States to become the largest producer of publications — it is now only about 35,000 papers short. By some measures, China has already overtaken the United States.

The quality of China’s science in terms of citations is also increasing, says Wagner. But for this to continue, the country will need to remain open to global influences, she says. China’s censorship of Internet sources has left scientists complaining of blocked databases and limited Internet searches, she notes.

“As you become more [globally] engaged, you also know what’s at the leading edges of science,” says Wagner. “And that is so important in order to catch the really top-level citations.”

Egypt and Pakistan had highest rise in research output in 2018
 
Imran Khan Latches On To Naseeruddin Shah's Remarks, Says Will Show Modi Govt How To Treat Minorities | Indian Defence News


Lo & behold, ladies & gentle men - the nation which's cleansed it's past, supposedly, has spoken. Thru the rear or the front, it's for you to decide.


Mera bhai daulatmand hain kyunki uski kismat acchi hain syndrome.

P. S - the pathan is my favourite Pak PM. He will definitely conquer Kashmir after initiating Fhazwa e Hind. What say @Ashwin?
Too much India from him... And there has been a cold shoulder from our Man... Infact he has been ignored by our PM...

I guess some one should take a tuition on history of Pakistan..... He seems to be living on a lala land....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pundrick
Stop getting personal..... If you think any of the posts violates rules....Report and move on...We may miss some offensive posts but reporting does help us
 
Pakistan plans to use GPS-guided mortar to target Indian Army bunkers – Indian Defence Research Wing

while are still trying to beat the snail in tenders to buy out of date weapons from Russia .
 
Pakistan ranked among ‘10 coolest places to visit in 2019’
The world is a happening place and while we were busy keeping up with what’s happening around the world, Forbes in a recent listicle titled “10 coolest places to go to in 2019” placed Pakistan in the list.

The list was compiled by a traveller Ann Abel after she spoke to leading travel agents regarding the must-visit places across the globe.

“Explore the valleys of Hunza, Shigar and Khaplu via the renowned Karakoram Highway,” said Sara Barbieri, a specialist working with luxury travel website GeoEx.

“This little-visited region in the far northeast of the country offers the kind of startlingly striking scenery that compels you to gaze from the window without blinking, for fear of missing a moment of the majesty of the landscape — or one of the astounding suspension bridges that cross the surging rivers filled with snow melt,” she further writes. “Add to this the warm welcome of the people, the glacial blue of Attabad Lake, the centuries of history, the juxtaposition of granite to greenery, the chance to walk through an age old-apricot orchard along water channels cut by hand, and the blazing snow-covered glory of Rakiposhi and you must acknowledge there is a grand adventure to be had,” she added.

Other must visit places for 2019 include the Azores in Portugal, Eastern Bhutan, Los Cabos in Mexico, Colombia, Ethiopia, Madagascar, Mongolia, Rwanda and the Turkish Riviera.​

Source
The 10 Coolest Places to Go in 2019
 
  • Like
Reactions: ni8mare
Pakistan owes $6 billion to China under CPEC

411052_7300367_cpec_akhbar.jpg

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan needs to pay back six billion dollars under debt obligations of c initiative over the next two decades, the planning ministry said on Wednesday.

“Government of Pakistan’s financial liability is only to the tune of $6 billion comprising of low interest loans and grants in infrastructure projects spread over 20 to 25 years payback period,” the ministry of planning, development and reform said in a statement, referring to China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) projects.

“CPEC outflows would start from the year 2021 and spread over 20 to 25 years.”

CPEC is a flagship and most active project of Belt and Road initiative with the corridor finances comprising of government-to-government loans, private investment and grants. Currently, 22 CPEC projects are progressing at various stages of implementation.

The planning ministry refuted the claims that the liability of Pakistan under CPEC amounts to $40 billion.
The ministry said the energy projects are being executed under independent power producers’ mode and finances are mainly taken by the private companies against their own balance sheets.

“Therefore, debt would be borne by the investors instead of any obligation on part of the Pakistani government,” it added. “The dividends of the energy sector projects are also based on profit and loss and are subject to individual company’s financing policies.”

Debt accruing is also amortised in the financial structure and is included in the project viability analysis and business plans of the private enterprise.

Therefore, CPEC is not imposing any burden with respect to loans repayment and energy sector outflows. The planning ministry said the resultant benefits of the investments to the Pakistani economy would far outweigh the outflows.

The government has prepared the data on the inflow/outflow in consultation with relevant stakeholders, including ministry of finance. “(It) is available in public domain for discussion with relevant institutions.

The ministry said China and Pakistan decided to broaden the scope and expedite pace of CPEC. “Innovative financing mechanisms are being developed for financing new projects in CPEC,” it added.

“Therefore, the inflow of CPEC projects will continue to increase in the form of private investment in special economic zones, which were prioritised in the recent JCC (joint cooperation committee) meeting, energy projects through indigenous resources, agriculture, socio-economic development sector and infrastructure based on pragmatic planning and due diligence on both the sides.” The 8th meeting of the JCC on CPEC was held last week in Beijing.

Pakistan owes $6 billion to China under CPEC
 
Too much India from him... And there has been a cold shoulder from our Man... Infact he has been ignored by our PM...

I guess some one should take a tuition on history of Pakistan..... He seems to be living on a lala land....
Now only if India could do the same at UN, instead of tu tu main main.
 
Obviously not China, we have no real reason to launch an attack on them (unless at some point in the future they become uniquely vulnerable, offering an opportunity to gain valuable features/territory). But in Pak's case, all we'll need is a decent excuse.

This assessment of the situation (and our stand on it) is simply incorrect. The reality is that there is absolutely no intent on the part of the Government of India to initiate any kind of large scale military action with the objective of capturing PoK.

No intent whatsoever.

Golden opportunities for launching such a campaign have come and gone, with no interest shown by the Indian decision-makers to act. The most recent was the period drawing up to their relatively recent general elections. The country was a mess, with most of the Army's strength deployed internally (to the point were PA was making peace overtures toward India). And what did we do? Nothing.

"But in Pak's case, all we'll need is a decent excuse."

Pakistan gives us about a dozen decent excuses per month in the form of jihadi cross-LoC infiltrations. At least one major excuse once every few years in the form of a sizeable ISI-sponsered terrorist attack against civilians and/or armed forces either within India or on our overseas diplomatic missions, and an un-redeemable excuse about once a decade or so in the form of a major incident (Parliament attack, Kargil, 26/11 etc.).

The problem is not about them giving us an excuse. That is the weakest argument. The problem is what the Indian decision-maker is willing to do about it - which is found lacking. Modi is not some farishta. In many ways, he's similar to the usual Indian politician, and one of those ways is the manner in which our politicians think and hope that if you give a problem enough time, it will solve itself without you having to get your hands dirty. This lack of proactiveness is true with regard to Modi as well. I'm sorry but I expected more from him and he's simply not delivering.

Before anyone yells "surgical strikes", let me ask you this: What exact geopolitical equation was changed because of the surgical strikes? It was a temporary solution to what is now a permanent problem. And the only permanent solution is the capture of PoK, which the Modi government has shown no intent to execute.

The powers-that-be in Pakistan and China have now fully realized that the Indian state is willing to exert no influence or military strength in a contested region beyond its own borders (or the area which we administer) and as long as they don't try to initiate all-out military conflict by bringing their military inside these borders (thereby not having to face the brunt of the Indian Military's strength), they can have their way with how they choose to shape the geopolitical lines all around India.

I'll tell you where this is likely to go from here. No matter how much the Pakistani military might develop, China will not consider them as capable enough to prevent an Indian capture of PoK (if and when we choose to act), as a result they will seek to exert some level of direct or indirect control of PoK (read, large-scale Chinese military presence), much like how they control Shaksgham Valley. This is because if they are unable to retain control over PoK, the physical link between Pak and China will be cut, CPEC will fall apart, as well as a very important leg of BRI. There's no telling how much importance China ascribes to PoK, and why they will go to any length to defend it.

And if GoI is unwilling to fight through a bunch of Pakistanis to get PoK, what are the chances that we will be willing to fight through a bunch of Pakistanis AND Chinese?

I just wish to say, rather, warn...that the window on PoK is closing fast. The time to act is ASAP.

With Nawaz Sharif going behind bars, there exists a possibility that a massive politically-orchestrated divide between Sunni Punjabis and Pashtuns develops in Pakistan (and we should support it in any way possible via intelligence). If such a divide reaches a peak with it requiring massive Pak military internal deployments, that would be a potential golden moment again - in which a military capture of PoK might become a feasibility.

But are the Indian decision-makers ready or even willing to make such moves?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: suryakiran and Paro
This assessment of the situation (and our stand on it) is simply incorrect. The reality is that there is absolutely no intent on the part of the Government of India to initiate any kind of large scale military action with the objective of capturing PoK.

No intent whatsoever.

Golden opportunities for launching such a campaign have come and gone, with no interest shown by the Indian decision-makers to act. The most recent was the period drawing up to their relatively recent general elections. The country was a mess, with most of the Army's strength deployed internally (to the point were PA was making peace overtures toward India). And what did we do? Nothing.

"But in Pak's case, all we'll need is a decent excuse."

Pakistan gives us about a dozen decent excuses per month in the form of jihadi cross-LoC infiltrations. At least one major excuse once every few years in the form of a sizeable ISI-sponsered terrorist attack against civilians and/or armed forces either within India or on our overseas diplomatic missions, and an un-redeemable excuse about once a decade or so in the form of a major incident (Parliament attack, Kargil, 26/11 etc.).

The problem is not about them giving us an excuse. That is the weakest argument. The problem is what the Indian decision-maker is willing to do about it - which is found lacking. Modi is not some farishta. In many ways, he's similar to the usual Indian politician, and one of those ways is the manner in which our politicians think and hope that if you give a problem enough time, it will solve itself without you having to get your hands dirty. This lack of proactiveness is true with regard to Modi as well. I'm sorry but I expected more from him and he's simply not delivering.

Before anyone yells "surgical strikes", let me ask you this: What exact geopolitical equation was changed because of the surgical strikes? It was a temporary solution to what is now a permanent problem. And the only permanent solution is the capture of PoK, which the Modi government has shown no intent to execute.

The powers-that-be in Pakistan and China have now fully realized that the Indian state is willing to exert no influence or military strength in a contested region beyond its own borders (or the area which we administer) and as long as they don't try to initiate all-out military conflict by bringing their military inside these borders (thereby not having to face the brunt of the Indian Military's strength), they can have their way with how they choose to shape the geopolitical lines all around India.

I'll tell you where this is likely to go from here. No matter how much the Pakistani military might develop, China will not consider them as capable enough to prevent an Indian capture of PoK (if and when we choose to act), as a result they will seek to exert some level of direct or indirect control of PoK (read, large-scale Chinese military presence), much like how they control Shaksgham Valley. This is because if they are unable to retain control over PoK, the physical link between Pak and China will be cut, CPEC will fall apart, as well as a very important leg of BRI. There's no telling how much importance China ascribes to PoK, and why they will go to any length to defend it.

And if GoI is unwilling to fight through a bunch of Pakistanis to get PoK, what are the chances that we will be willing to fight through a bunch of Pakistanis AND Chinese?

I just wish to say, rather, warn...that the window on PoK is closing fast. The time to act is ASAP.

With Nawaz Sharif going behind bars, there exists a possibility that a massive politically-orchestrated divide between Sunni Punjabis and Pashtuns develops in Pakistan (and we should support it in any way possible via intelligence). If such a divide reaches a peak with it requiring massive Pak military internal deployments, that would be a potential golden moment again - in which a military capture of PoK might become a feasibility.

But are the Indian decision-makers ready or even willing to make such moves?

The problem of GOI is to justify the Casualties that will happen when we go for POK , Indians don't really care for POK

Kargil was a different matter

We were fighting to get back our own land