What that fool doesn't know & should be exposed for his ignorance is that as per the service rules prevalent today, any state or ethnic regiment will contain anywhere between 25-30% of it's natives. The rest of the regiment is made up of outsiders in every sense of the word. The deceased CO himself was a Malayali from Hyderabad. Correct me if I'm wrong. @vstol Jockey ; @FalconSocial affairs editor of The Hindu claiming government deliberately sent soldiers of Bihar regiment with native Biharis, so that if something goes south with them, political benifits from upcoming Bihar election will be certain.
Yes , what a shit logic these media houses spin. They will cast Santosh babu as a bihari replacing babu with kumarWhat that fool doesn't know & should be exposed for his ignorance is that as per the service rules prevalent today, any state or ethnic regiment will contain anywhere between 25-30% of it's natives. The rest of the regiment is made up of outsiders in every sense of the word. The deceased CO himself was a Malayali from Hyderabad. Correct me if I'm wrong. @vstol Jockey ; @Falcon
War has become inevitable. The limited kind.
Social affairs editor of The Hindu claiming government deliberately sent soldiers of Bihar regiment with native Biharis, so that if something goes south with them, political benifits from upcoming Bihar election will be certain.
The deceased CO himself was a Malayali from Hyderabad
I think @screambowl here does a better job on the subject matter. Then again if you've heard screambowl on it, why do you need Swamy's views?Dr Subramanian Swamy is live to speak on - how India can Win against China - Pak & be Superpower!
Could be. But I remember reading a news report on 17th June claiming he's a malayali. Let me try to locate that report. In any case he wasn't a native Bihari.Just for clarification, I think the deceased CO is a proper Telugu as his surname (Bikkumalla) suggests. His full name is Bikkumalla Santhosh Babu. This type of surname is unique to Telugus.
It doesn't matter for me from where he hails. He commanded an Indian Unit, fought like an Indian and died Indian.
3. The Chinese casualties are estimates. Estimates are based on what you assume you know. And has an observer bias always. The scuffle was uphill for own troops. Let me know when person throwing stones from top is dominated by those from bottom running up a rocky terrain in high altitude. And moving in phases. More crap than I can rebut floats around. Facts do not have PLA casualties greater than IA, including all types KIA and wounded (even scratched).
Most of people here are diverted. Look at Chinese trick. They very brilliantly moved the dispute from Indian claiming whole Aksai Chin to settlement of LAC. Now instead of talking about Aksai Chin, Indians will be satisfied and declare LAC what Chinese believe in as IB. Brilliant Indians, you owe claps and full 21 gun salute for your mind games. Bravo!! Where as Chinese have bargained settlement of LAC as permanent IB with India of their choice in return of peace.
Badi badi batein kartey hai yahan aakar. that they will deploy Su30, 2.5 front war , Brahmos, and radar systems, and big big discussions. Useless!!
I think our response will continue to be reactive, our PM made it clear that if we are provoked, we will hit back hard.
Now the question is define provocation - When is it to be called as provocation ?
1) China is responsible for the bloodbath when they got their a** handed to them by IA, then trying to shift blame on India. (Provocation?)
2) China claiming that Galwan always belonged to China, like seriously!! (Provocation?)
3) Massive build up along the LAC, and why, because we were building a road within our border. (Provocation?)
So, what I want to understand is the tolerance threshold, beyond which GoI/IA will consider it to be a provocation.
Hello Sir , it is China which is worried about India reclaiming Aksai Chin in 10 years time
Therefore they are trying to stop our
Infrastructure work
And now with this behaviour they have made us their permanent enemy
We will surely take big revenge , it is just a matter of time
is there going to be retaliation or do we have to swallow this and move on?
The ‘usual hanky panky’ over years now looks like a ruse to successfully lull us into talks / diplomacy when facts are being changed on the ground
I don't think they are seeking a border settlement. They don't need it. It is the biggest tool in their inventory to undermine us whenever they want. For me it was a military coercion to gainThey are trying to seek a settlement with India over borders. That I am dead sure about.