Line of Actual Control (LAC) : India & Tibet Border Updates

Social affairs editor of The Hindu claiming government deliberately sent soldiers of Bihar regiment with native Biharis, so that if something goes south with them, political benifits from upcoming Bihar election will be certain.
What that fool doesn't know & should be exposed for his ignorance is that as per the service rules prevalent today, any state or ethnic regiment will contain anywhere between 25-30% of it's natives. The rest of the regiment is made up of outsiders in every sense of the word. The deceased CO himself was a Malayali from Hyderabad. Correct me if I'm wrong. @vstol Jockey ; @Falcon
 
What that fool doesn't know & should be exposed for his ignorance is that as per the service rules prevalent today, any state or ethnic regiment will contain anywhere between 25-30% of it's natives. The rest of the regiment is made up of outsiders in every sense of the word. The deceased CO himself was a Malayali from Hyderabad. Correct me if I'm wrong. @vstol Jockey ; @Falcon
Yes , what a shit logic these media houses spin. They will cast Santosh babu as a bihari replacing babu with kumar
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hellfire
War has become inevitable. The limited kind.

Why what happened now?

Social affairs editor of The Hindu claiming government deliberately sent soldiers of Bihar regiment with native Biharis, so that if something goes south with them, political benifits from upcoming Bihar election will be certain.

Modi's fault. He was the one mentioning about Bihar regiment exclusively. Mauka to Modi bhi nahi chordhta.

The deceased CO himself was a Malayali from Hyderabad

late maj sandeep unnikrishnan was also from 7 Bihar. Looks like army is sending most of Malyalis to Bihar reg.
 
I just realized that Chinese MFA spokesperson has served in Pakistan for 8 years as diplomat. Wow!

And here i was thinking i am being harsh, rather paddling conspiracy theories, in comparing him to ISPR.

He worked in "Mecca of lies on Earth" with Gafoor as prophet. No wonder he's giving same template responses void of facts and rich in obfuscation.

He even denied IA troops being PoWs because it seems PLA troops were too PoWs with IA. CCP couldn't let this embarrassment out, but our foot in the mouth media did.
 
Dr Subramanian Swamy is live to speak on - how India can Win against China - Pak & be Superpower!

I think @screambowl here does a better job on the subject matter. Then again if you've heard screambowl on it, why do you need Swamy's views?
Just for clarification, I think the deceased CO is a proper Telugu as his surname (Bikkumalla) suggests. His full name is Bikkumalla Santhosh Babu. This type of surname is unique to Telugus.

It doesn't matter for me from where he hails. He commanded an Indian Unit, fought like an Indian and died Indian.
Could be. But I remember reading a news report on 17th June claiming he's a malayali. Let me try to locate that report. In any case he wasn't a native Bihari.
 
3. The Chinese casualties are estimates. Estimates are based on what you assume you know. And has an observer bias always. The scuffle was uphill for own troops. Let me know when person throwing stones from top is dominated by those from bottom running up a rocky terrain in high altitude. And moving in phases. More crap than I can rebut floats around. Facts do not have PLA casualties greater than IA, including all types KIA and wounded (even scratched).

Gotta correct this... ;)
 
The reason I am posting this is because realise that psyops is a real thing and China has a dedicated department with huge investments for that. The usual suspects are today shifting goalposts to discredit this government. Remember we win or lose together, notwithstanding our liking or hatred for Modi! Understand the same people who had sources telling them that Chinese took our guys captived definitely knew that we had Chinks in our custody too! They didn't tell you that. Ask yourself why?
Ea8nJKkUMAA30zr.jpg

Offered without comments!
mv,jhv.jpg
 
Most of people here are diverted. Look at Chinese trick. They very brilliantly moved the dispute from Indian claiming whole Aksai Chin to settlement of LAC. Now instead of talking about Aksai Chin, Indians will be satisfied and declare LAC what Chinese believe in as IB. Brilliant Indians, you owe claps and full 21 gun salute for your mind games. Bravo!! Where as Chinese have bargained settlement of LAC as permanent IB with India of their choice in return of peace.

Badi badi batein kartey hai yahan aakar. that they will deploy Su30, 2.5 front war , Brahmos, and radar systems, and big big discussions. Useless!!
 
Most of people here are diverted. Look at Chinese trick. They very brilliantly moved the dispute from Indian claiming whole Aksai Chin to settlement of LAC. Now instead of talking about Aksai Chin, Indians will be satisfied and declare LAC what Chinese believe in as IB. Brilliant Indians, you owe claps and full 21 gun salute for your mind games. Bravo!! Where as Chinese have bargained settlement of LAC as permanent IB with India of their choice in return of peace.

Badi badi batein kartey hai yahan aakar. that they will deploy Su30, 2.5 front war , Brahmos, and radar systems, and big big discussions. Useless!!

Hello Sir , it is China which is worried about India reclaiming Aksai Chin in 10 years time

Therefore they are trying to stop our
Infrastructure work

And now with this behaviour they have made us their permanent enemy

We will surely take big revenge , it is just a matter of time
 
I think our response will continue to be reactive, our PM made it clear that if we are provoked, we will hit back hard.
Now the question is define provocation - When is it to be called as provocation ?

New definition is amended to include any act of the enemy in interfering with our troops' activities to enforce and reinforce legitimacy of Indian presence on India's actually controlled land.


1) China is responsible for the bloodbath when they got their a** handed to them by IA, then trying to shift blame on India. (Provocation?)

I won't say they got anything handed to them. The phase 1 saw our guys suckered in and nastily attacked. Provoked. Phase 2, Gen VK Singh has already publicly pointed out, was quite different for them.

2) China claiming that Galwan always belonged to China, like seriously!! (Provocation?)

Reacted. Calibrated and reacted.


3) Massive build up along the LAC, and why, because we were building a road within our border. (Provocation?)

We are very strongly situated along SSN. The PLA is trying to create a situation there in order to undermine that strength.

Or may be, some time in future -

So, what I want to understand is the tolerance threshold, beyond which GoI/IA will consider it to be a provocation.

For once, we have calibrated our reaction. Now the long game starts. Hopefully.
 
Hello Sir , it is China which is worried about India reclaiming Aksai Chin in 10 years time

Therefore they are trying to stop our
Infrastructure work

And now with this behaviour they have made us their permanent enemy

We will surely take big revenge , it is just a matter of time


My point is when Modi ji said that Chinese have not intruded Indian territory this means Aksai Chin is not Indian territory? Chinese are already 200km in Aksai Chin. That's why it is called as Aksai Chin. His statement will be used against Indian design one day.
 
is there going to be retaliation or do we have to swallow this and move on?


Retaliation will always be there. Please remember this is China, a nation quite large to bring down on own. I always point out how USSR collapsed. Join the dots that are there openly now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sathya
The ‘usual hanky panky’ over years now looks like a ruse to successfully lull us into talks / diplomacy when facts are being changed on the ground


That is Chinese modus operandi something I consistently point out. But for us, war is also an option of last resort. They are trying to seek a settlement with India over borders. That I am dead sure about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sathya
They are trying to seek a settlement with India over borders. That I am dead sure about.
I don't think they are seeking a border settlement. They don't need it. It is the biggest tool in their inventory to undermine us whenever they want. For me it was a military coercion to gain
diplo-economic concessions from the starting. But with this Galwan valley incident they have messed it badly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SrNair