What I like the most is that even the young New Generation of
Indians are happily supporting Russia on Twitter
Indians are happily supporting Russia on Twitter
You mean ones with a different shade of skin colour from white aren't treated differently in the west .A bunch of Hindu nationalists who cry about racism the loudest without a hint of irony.
Asia is literally home to a billion Muslims off whom 600 million + hail from the sub continent. Add another 200 million + from Indonesia. What're you on about ?Dark skin or being muslim in Asia is a sure fire way to get treated like a second hand citizen.
And how does that make Russia right in this case? It's as dumb as people in the UK supporting Russia because they were on our side during WWII.
Ok sweetie , I've asked you this before , what was the Cuban missile crisis all about ?Lol. I just love how you think a nation should do what a bigger bordering nation tells them what to do. I guess the same applies to India? China is much more powerful than you Indians. If China tells you what organization you can't join but India still is interested in joining and invites war I guess it will be India's fault according to your TARD logic, eh?
Where are the weapons of mass destruction that prompted Bush & company to launch Gulf War -2 ?It's not just you but there's a handful of idiots that think like this because they have to find a way to justify Russia's unprovoked invasion of a sovereign nation so they have to think REALLY hard and the only thing they can come up with is, they had it coming for thinking about joining NATO.![]()
Please quote here in as many words what Putin said to that effect ?Putin himself said this isn't about NATO but about Ukraine existing as a state but still you have imbeciles that believe Ukraine brought this invasion on themselves because they had the audacity as a sovereign nation to want to join an organization.
It's a Ukrainian news source so who knows if true...![]()
White House weighs 3-way deal to get fighter jets to Ukraine
Poland wants to donate its old MiGs to Ukraine. But there’s a catch — it needs U.S. jets.www.yahoo.com
Let him try. If he fires a single round over the western border of Ukraine he's done.It's a Ukrainian news source so who knows if true...
Putie-Poo has said ay nation that interferes will suffer severe consequences but so far nothing has happen even though Javelin's, NLAWS and stingers are reeking havoc but could this be the redlie?
I doubt it.
My opinion, Kashmir isn't worth it. Originally it was supposed to be independent of both India and Pakistan if my knowledge of history serves me correctly.
Yup. At last count dozens of economic offenders , narcotic smugglers , terrorists etc apart from murderers who happen to be fugitives of justice from India have found refuge in UK with massive investments in UK too in real estate , stocks , finances etc .Good, people in London might actually be able to afford a home, rather than entire blocks of apartments being rented out to nobody for money laundering.
That's what I thought, and you answered my next question, which was going to be, "why is it so valuable?"In reality, no one in the government have any serious plan of invading Pakistan occupied Kashmir. The main reason prime minister Nehru stopped 1948 Indian military campaign in J&K was due to the fact the territory under Pakistan control is economically worthless. Entire valley and popular settlements are under Indian control and that's when he stopped the war. 90% Pakistan admistated kashmir is constituted of Gilgit& Baltistan, a mountainous region with just 1.3 million population. It have like 50 mountains higher than 23,000 feet alone. Taking such a mountainous terrain is a Military nightmare, and not very practical. Taking Islamabad is far more easier.
While economically it's insignificant, it does have strategic importance. Cutting off Pakistan from China, and opening up a border with Afghanistan and further to central Asia.
Which will all bring an added cost to doing business, while at the same time Russia loses assets and any trade with most of the world.
But they will supply material support, Russia will not if China tells them so.
Let's here from people with degrees in economics then.Dude, you really need to look into these things. A physics degree won't help.
They are the ones who supplied to us at the fastest speed during any emergency. The same with emergency purchases. We bought 70000 AK-203s in Aug last year and got the whole lot by Jan this year. With America, the same order for SIGs needs 1.5 years.
Let him try. If he fires a single round over the western border of Ukraine he's done.
The only thing keeping him alive is that NATO are kind of lazy and reluctant following the last 2 decades, but if he decides not to give them a choice and starts firing stuff over the border, that will necessitate action.
He's suffered enough aircraft losses in Ukraine, wait and see what happens if he f**ks with us.
That's what I thought, and you answered my next question, which was going to be, "why is it so valuable?"
The reason for historical differences is simple. Pakistan was smarter than you and aligned with NATO during the Cold War and reaped the benefits of that despite often being in the wrong. You made a bad decision and aligned with the brotherhood of dictatorships (despite being a democracy) which had consequences.
He's remembering history a little too much. 1971 is 51 years ago now. As regards this war being the west's creation, nope. It was entirely the will of the Ukrainian people to break free from Russia and try to join the EU, and Russia could not handle that. The guy is lying to himself on that one.
The Economist & NPR . One a fanboy of Chinese style Predatory business & the latter a mouthpiece of the US & den of wokes.Let's here from people with degrees in economics then.
![]()
How new sanctions could cripple Russia’s economy
The brutal logic behind measures targeting the central bankwww.economist.com
![]()
How everyday Russians are feeling the impact from sanctions
Rising prices, stranded tourists and lines at ATMs are just some of the ways ordinary Russians are seeing repercussions from sanctions and restrictions imposed on their country for invading Ukraine.www.npr.org
Russia won't supply you at all in a conflict with China, which is when you'll most need it. By comparison Pakistan is a terrier and China is Panda on crack.
Let's here from people with degrees in economics then.
![]()
How new sanctions could cripple Russia’s economy
The brutal logic behind measures targeting the central bankwww.economist.com
![]()
How everyday Russians are feeling the impact from sanctions
Rising prices, stranded tourists and lines at ATMs are just some of the ways ordinary Russians are seeing repercussions from sanctions and restrictions imposed on their country for invading Ukraine.www.npr.org
Russia won't supply you at all in a conflict with China, which is when you'll most need it. By comparison Pakistan is a terrier and China is Panda on crack.
50 yrs hence this would be history too as would you . What's your point ? You still keep celebrating your victory in WW-2 don't you & keep demonizing Hitler long after he & his loathed ideology perished .He's remembering history a little too much. 1971 is 51 years ago now. As regards this war being the west's creation, nope. It was entirely the will of the Ukrainian people to break free from Russia and try to join the EU, and Russia could not handle that. The guy is lying to himself on that one.
Spain did not join NATO until after it became a democracy.Back in the day west/western allied nations were not necessarily democratic. While it is true that Soviet block didn't had any democratic country and most of western dictatorships slowly turned democratic.
Spain was a dictatorship, so was Portugal. NATO members like Turkey was also Military dictatorship. South Korea was a dictatorship, so was Taiwan and south Vietnam. India was anti colonial and many Western states were colonial up untill the 70s and that contributed mostly to India distancing from West in the early post war era. When Pakistan joined western alliance, India moved towards Soviets. Cold war alliances were mostly based on political interests, not ideological.